January 12, 2009

Some businesses open while others close

Apparently Macy's is closing 11 stores. Fortunately not the one in Lakewood Center. The only one closing in CA is i downtown LA.

Albertsons announced plans Friday to close one of its two stores in the city. The store at 3400 E. South St., is scheduled to close on Feb. 19. This store has been open since 1998.

Workers are working feverishly on the old Bakers Square at South and Bellflower to renovate it into a new Denny's. It will open in February. LAAG got the city to speed up the permit approval. In this economy

Lakewood Center claims that the Costco in Lakewood Center will open in February and will not be delayed to March.

The Mervyns that is closing will become a Forever 21 store as reported earlier.

No word on the Sonic Drive In location. We heard it could open at Woodruff and Harvey Way which was the site of a former Arco gas station. More on that as we learn it.

The Fresh & Easy Market celebrated its one year anniversary at South and Woodruff. We did not think it would last this long. Perhaps the new Farm Direct Market opening (5927 South St.) on the NE corner of South and Woodruff will give it some competition. We see lots of work going on there but no opening date is known. This is not a chain store. The Jones Bicycles store was the last retail store that we can recall in the space. It closed a number of years ago and the store remained vacant ever since.

The old Vons parking lot at South and Bellflower is getting completely repaved with new planters and sprinkler systems. Hopefully this will make it more palatable to prospective tenants, which the site has needed badly for years. The city has taken years to pressure the landowners to fix up the site.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

January 11, 2009

CrimeReports.com..first impressions

Leave it to the City of Lakewood to make sure its citizens are the last to know about new developments that really affect them. We noticed over on www.LBReport.com that LBPD unveiled a third party crime stats website that looks pretty good so far. It is called CrimeReports.com. Users can log in to receive customized crime reports and set up an auto emailed report telling them crimes that have been reported with a certain distance from their selected address. Clearly it took some real private sector brains and capital to put this together using raw data supplied by a number of local agencies, including LASD and LBPD. LAAG has been requesting this type of site from the city for some time. It looks like this was a joint effort by multiple cities and agencies but for some unknown reason Lakewood did not want to tell its residents about the service. Nothing on Lakewood's website as of today nor any emails from the city on this new site. Of course we saw no mention of the site on the LASD.org site either which is not really surprising as the LASD.org site wins the prize for the poorest design, poorest user friendly navigation and poorest up to date information of any law enforcement agency of that size (8,000 officers and counting). Given that this CrimeReports.com site was given information by most if not all LASD contract cities, you would have thought that they would have wanted to get the word out. The CrimeReports.com site appears to have data all the way back to July 1, 2008, however we are still trying to determine when the site went live for Lakewood residents to use.

Here are things we like from what we can see so far:

* alerts can be set up and emailed to you;
* it is multi jurisdictional so that you can see crime occurring just over the city border and how your city fares compared to other cities and neighborhoods;
* it seems to be fairly up to date showing crime occurring in the current day; this will likely vary depending on when the LASD releases crime data and when the site owner updates the map; this is likely an automated schedule;
* it is Google maps based so its user friendly;
* it includes registered sex offender information and a fairly good selection of crimes;
* users can drill down by crime, location and time;

Limitations or areas requiring further study or refinement:

* Not clear on how many total days the crime info is kept in the system in a viewable way;
* Not clear how to get printable reports (as opposed to mapped reports);
* Not clear how information gets into this site or its accuracy;
* Clearly this is reported or officer observed crimes but does not report all call data where a report was not generated;
* Not clear what crimes are not on the report, such as quality of life issues i.e. noise complaints, fireworks, parking issues;
* Not clear how far back the data goes or how long it will be available on the site;
* Not clear what this is costing Lakewood taxpayers or if it is included in the LASD $9 million a year contract cost to Lakewood. From the CrimeReports.com website they report the following monthly fees:

For Universities $49/month
Up to 50K citizens $99/month
Over 50K citizens $199/month (likely Lakewood so $2400 per year)

"Custom pricing applies to agencies serving contract jurisdictions. Please contact us for additional information"

If all this costs is 2400 a year its a good deal as that is about what one day of vacation time costs the city for one LASD deputy!!

Once we work with the site in more detail we will report further. Once you have used the site please give LAAG your feed back on this crime site at updates@LAAG.us

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

December 22, 2008

Waiting for the next shoe to drop

Well isn't this just great. First residential real estate. Now its commercial real estates turn. Right after Christmas and the January blow outs I suspect there will be much bloodletting by the retail sector. Costco opening in February 2009 could not have picked a worse time to open. Poor holiday sales (when some make over 50% of their yearly income) will not bode well for renewing that costly lease at the mall. This could be bad for Lakewood which relies heavily upon what small retail sector we have. And most of Lakewood's "retail eggs" are concentrated in the Mall "basket". And you know the saying. Never put all your eggs in one basket (in case it drops). But there is plenty of grief to go around. Cerritos must really be hurting as it relied very heavily on Cerritos Auto Square revenue to furnish lavish city projects (which it still has to maintain). Oh well as the cities like to say about tax revenue..."easy come easy go..."

Real-estate developers reportedly seeking U.S. relief

Dec. 22, 2008

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Developers of large commercial real-estate projects are seeking access to government investment funds as at least $160 billion of debt comes due for refinancing next year and lenders are thin on the ground for the embattled industry, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday. The paper said that developers of projects like malls, hotels and office complexes are seeking access to the recently announced Treasury plan to provide $200 billion of credit relief to borrowers on auto and student loans and credit-card debt. Some of the developers have also reportedly suggested a separate program aimed solely at projects in commercial real estate. The Journal's report quoted a letter that a dozen developers recently sent to Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, in which they say: "Right now, we believe there is insufficient systemic capacity to refinance expiring, performing commercial real-estate loans. For many borrowers, [credit] simply is not available." The report said that delinquencies on commercial mortgages jumped to 0.96% in November, up from a 0.62% rate in September.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/commercial-real-estate-may-next/story.aspx?guid={B8584A95-BB8F-4DB4-A3B3-C9B183F10C92}&dist=TNMostRead

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

December 17, 2008

LAAG's reply to the City's comments in the Press Telegram 12-15-08

Most of our loyal readers (and many new ones) saw the 12/15/08 Press Telegram feature written about our site. Of course the city of Lakewood was queried about the site. LAAG wanted an opportunity to address some of the comments made by Councilman Rogers in the article. And of course as we have many times before, we offer the city space on our pages to offer rebuttals to what they feel is inaccurate on our site. To date the city has not taken us up on that offer.

With respect to the March 2009 city council election candidate filing dates not being not well publicized, on that issue, Councilman (excuse me, vice mayor) Todd Rogers says there was an announcement about incumbents seeking re-election on the front page of the Lakewood Community, a Chamber of Commerce Publication that goes to every home in the city. "It clearly told everybody in town that there was an election," Rogers said.

We found the November 2008 issue of the Lakewood Chamber of Commerce newspaper. (we are not sure of the date when it was actually distributed) Again this is the paper that most people throw directly into the trash after it sits on their lawn for a few days. Each month it has a puff piece written by the "mayor" (or likely some ghost writer) or some other councilperson talking about some "issue" (a real or fake one). In November one small article was about how the three incumbents were "kicking off" their March 2009 re-election "campaigns" with a 100 person dinner (wonder who paid for that?) at city hall (attended by you guessed it all the politicos and fireworks sellers that would have been voting for them in March 2009, along with our special friend Sheriff Baca!) NO WHERE in the article did it mention any deadlines for nominations or anything about that rather complicated process whatsoever. The Press Telegram ran no story at all (as they had no reporter for Lakewood at the time) nor was there any hint of a deadline on the city website. Why? Well if you are running for re-election the last thing you want to do is call a deadline to the attention of your potential opponents (like LAAG did) So yes there was hint of an "election" in the air, but as we said the city did everything it could to "hide" the nomination deadline to insure the three candidates would be a shoe in. And it worked.

Rogers, stated in the article that "city government is 'open', despite some of the assertions he has read [on LAAG]" and that "The city of Lakewood doesn't do anything in secret...". Well if hidden in the clerks office is your definition of open then I guess it is "open" (but only from 9-5 pm) But most folks dont walk into city hall every day for their news. They read news papers and now the web. So if you dont want people to know something just post it on a bulletin board in the clerks office. How many of you have read the bulletin board in the clerks office in the last year? LAAG believes in transparency in government as its our money they are wasting. "...Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants..." [Justice Louis D. Brandeis] We have a whole section devoted to government transparency. The reason governments dont want to post too much on the web is that people might actually see it, copy it (like LAAG) and start asking questions which politicians find "hard to answer". I think Long Beach Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske agrees.

Rogers also stated in the article that what the city does is "...based on the surveys and feedback we get from the community..." Well I saw two surveys on the Lakewood website and only very brief summaries at that with no specific questions asked. The last survey date we saw was 2006. LAAG plans to do some surveys as well and you can be sure when we do we will post them. The point being that only about 2,700 people vote in city council elections out of 80,000 residents. So how many of those polled do you really think are clued in about specific problems in the city?

As Campbell Brown recently said on CNN.com: "It goes without saying, the media is annoying. It is the media's job to be annoying. Especially those members of the media assigned to cover the president. Or in this case the president-elect. Their role is not to support [the City council] President-elect Barack Obama, but to challenge him, to do their best to hold him accountable."

If you want to read cheerleader "puff pieces" about the City and the City Council then read the city's website or those from the Lakewood Chamber of Commerce "throw away" "news"paper that comes out once a month. There are plenty of places to find that kind of news. Not here.

We don't think Lakewood is a bad city nor the city council the worst. There are much worse. But there are much better too. We need to strive for improvement. We think this site is one way of encouraging change by trying to make the city more "transparent" or calling foul when everyone else is too afraid to or have given up on dealing with city hall as it is. And who could blame them.

Mr Rogers concluding dismissive comments about LAAG in the Press Telegram article: "...[LAAG's] views are out of sync with the majority of residents. As an example, he cited [LAAG's] suggestion at a City Council meeting to look into the possibility of creating a city police department.." Well again you have to realize that Rogers is a sheriff captain (top person in the substation) in Carson and it sends shivers down his spine when you dare to criticise the sacred cow that signs his paychecks. The point LAAG was making (the context of which is when LASD totally dropped the ball on the Dunrobin explosion in March 2006 by its own admission) was that the city just accepted what the LASD fed them. It was the city council that had to hold the LASD accountable. It clearly had not and LAAG felt that the reason was that the LASD offered Lakewood its services on a "take it or leave it basis" and to get some competition on LASD's 9 million a year contract the city should get bids from other police agencies that offer contract law enforcement. Of course carving out a piece of LASD "territory" would be about as likely as Rogers "Lakewood school district" fantasy becoming a reality. Talk about out of sync.

We agree that LAAG is out of sync with the status quo and we aren't going to change one bit!

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

December 14, 2008

Web site keeps watch on Lakewood government

from the Long Beach Press Telegram
12/14/2008 edition

Steve [the LAAG editor] does not consider himself an investigative reporter.

"I am not a great writer," he says. "I kind of hack my way through it."

But he sees a place in the local media landscape for his not-for-profit news Web site, www.laag.us.

The site is the online voice of Lakewood Accountability Action Group, a residents group that organized in the aftermath of a March 2006 house explosion caused by an illegal fireworks stash.

"I am not a true news source," Steve, a former City Council candidate, says. "We're sort of a commentary site."

Indeed the site's slogan, "Times change, politics don't," is a play on the Lakewood city motto, "Times change, values don't."

Commentary aside, there is plenty of information - some would call it citizen journalism - on the LAAG site.

A recent post bemoans how no one challenged three City Council incumbents seeking re-election in March 2009.

Another story asks questions about the delay of the Costco store planned for Lakewood Center.

Favorite topics include government pensions, public employee unions, travel by public officials, the L.A. County Sheriff's Department, redevelopment, noise, zoning, traffic safety, utilities and, of course, one of Lakewood's oldest issues and most explosive issues - legal fireworks.

"That's why I support independent journalism," Steve says. "Everyone talks about national and state politics but no one talks about local issues."

Content comes from LAAG e-mail and phone tips from residents, business owners and city sources.

"People come to us to see if we can help them with problems," Steve, says.

A Lakewood resident since 1964, Steve says he started the site because public information that should be easily accessible sometimes is not.

"I say they like to hide stuff in plain view," he says. "One of my big topics is open government. I'd like to see more transparency."

An example, LAAG says, is the spring election.

LAAG says the candidate filing dates were not well publicized.

On that issue, Councilman Todd Rogers says there was an announcement about incumbents seeking re-election on the front page of the Lakewood Community, a Chamber of Commerce Publication that goes to every home in the city.

"It clearly told everybody in town that there was an election," Rogers said.

Another LAAG post on the topic criticized the city's low voter turnout, saying it amounted to government appointments made by the community's most influential members.

"Even Iraq has elections!" the post states.

LAAG is nonpartisan, and the organization does not consider itself liberal or conservative.

"We're anti-stupid spending," Steve says. "We like small government, which is what Lakewood is supposed to be, as a contract city, but we don't like waste, and we don't like secrecy."

Rogers, the city's vice mayor, counters the notion of secrecy. He says that city government is open, despite some of the assertions he has read online.

"I think our City Council does a pretty good job, and we have a history of honest, stable, responsive government," Rogers says. "And that's not going to change any time soon."

In addition to original content, LAAG picks up news stories from the Press-Telegram, Los Angeles Times and other media, but national and global topics are avoided.

Lakewood City Hall has taken notice.

"The biggest visitor to my site is the city of Lakewood," LAAG says of its online tracking that shows a few hits from City Hall on a typical day. He gets about 100 hits every week day.

Lakewood city spokesman Don Waldie says that LAAG's viewpoints are welcome in the "marketplace of ideas."

"In an open, democratic society with robust political institutions, local government wants to hear every opinion," he says.

Before the electronic age, Waldie says traditional media have challenged City Hall positions. The now-defunct Lakewood Clarion was known to take shots.

"LAAG's blog fits into a long tradition of talking about what local government does and why it does what it does," Waldie says.

But most important, Rogers says, is that constituents are, in his estimation, pleased with city government.

He believes LAAG's views are out of sync with the majority of residents. As an example, he cited LAAG's suggestion at a City Council meeting to look into the possibility of creating a city police department.

"The city of Lakewood doesn't do anything in secret, based on the surveys and feedback we get from the community," says Rogers, who is a captain at the Sheriff's station in Carson. "I think we're tuned into what the community wants, what the community values are, and they seem to trust and be happy with their government."

Rogers says he responds to inquiries from LAAG and is comfortable with criticism that goes with being on the council.

But he doesn't always like what he reads on the LAAG site.

"I think Lakewood's pretty transparent," he says. "I think a lot of his criticisms are unfair, and some of them are not true."

LAAG does not accept advertising.

"We're not interested in taking ads from some local businesses," says LAAG, a corporate consultant by day. "Every time you start taking ads, you get into the issue about advertisers complaining about things."

john.canalis@presstelegram.com, 562-499-1273


Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

December 13, 2008

Musical Chairs at the Mall

One store out, one store in. Forever 21 Inc. and Kohl's Corp. won a joint bid to move into 46 soon-to-be-empty Mervyns stores (out of a total of 149). Mervyns filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Reorganization) protection in July and subsequently decided to liquidate. As Lakewood already has a Kohl's near Carson and Paramount the Lakewood Center Mall Mervyns and the Los Cerritos Center Mervyns will become Forever 21 stores. Forever 21 is a store primarily for women under 25. Perfect as they are 80% of Mall shoppers. I guess we are leaving it up to teen women to pull us out of the retail slump!

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

December 12, 2008

KB Toys in Lakewood Center to close

KB Toys filed for chapter 11 Bankruptcy on 12/11/08, even before the Christmas holiday shopping season ended. It will be closing its Lakewood Center Mall location. For a toy store to close a few weeks before Christmas tells you how bad things are. It has been said that the next waive of the recession will affect credit cards and commercial real estate. Bad news for Lakewood Center Mall. Costco also reported flat earnings this week, so expectations are really low for the delayed opening of Costco Lakewood Center in mid February 2009 (if they can even meet that date). KB's spokesperson stated: "In order to maximize value of the assets through the store closing sales, it is imperative [KB] be authorized to conduct the store closing sale ... as soon as possible in order to take advantage last two weeks of the holiday selling season," KB filed bankruptcy three years earlier. Same-store sales have fallen 19.77% compared with last year. KB has 277 mall-based stores, 114 KB Toys Outlet stores, 40 KB Toy Works, and about 30 temporary holiday stores.

I guess someone will need to keep a tally sheet for Mall and store closings after January. Likely all the Costco opening will do in February 2009 will be making up for other store closings with no net gain or even a loss in sales tax revenues for the Mall.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

December 11, 2008

Why bother with Elections?

The City Clerk reported on 12/10/08 (via email) that only the three candidates completed the nomination process making them eligible to run in the March 2009 city council election. Mayor Steve Croft, Vice Mayor Todd Rogers, and Council Member Diane DuBois - the three incumbent council members - were the only candidates who sought to fill the three available seats when the nominating period ended on December 5 2008. We alerted Lakewood residents of this impending deadline but given the abysmal turnout in Lakewood city council elections (usually less than 3,000 votes for 41,000 registered voters or 7.3% turnout) it does not surprise us that no one but the incumbents threw their hat in the ring. LAAG felt that by at least notifying residents of the deadline (which the city failed to do) potential candidates would at least not be blindsided by the deadline. Now, since the number of candidates at the end of the nominating period equals the number of seats to be filled, state election law allows the nominees to be appointed. So Lakewood wont even have an election! (Even Iraq has elections!) Just as well save the money I suppose as Lakewood residents just dont care. Very sad. In hotly contested districts in Long Beach recently they have had 60% turnouts in recent elections. I guess people in Long Beach are just more aware of what is going on (or more likely what is not happening and should be). Lakewood voters for the most part dont even know what issues are going on in Lakewood that need attention. I suppose we should just dispense with elections in Lakewood and let city council members serve for life. Or perhaps we could institute a city monarchy (we have close to that as Larry Van Nostran is the longest "reigning" city councilman in California history we have read; first elected in 1975 which will be 34 years in 2009). Without elections and campaigns the city council will have no incentives whatsoever to listen to "voters" (all 3,000 of them). How many other city's in California fail to have elections? Likely none. Shame on you Lakewood. As punishment for your lack of civic interest in our system of government you should not be allowed to celebrate the 4th with fireworks. (now that will stir interest) Our founding fathers would be appalled at how we claim to be "democratic" or "patriotic" and how we can only show it with sparklers or car magnets.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

Another bike path crime

There is no indication that this victim was riding a bike but as we have pointed out before be very careful on these bike paths. Quite frankly its just too dangerous to be on them after sunset. You are better off on public streets after dark but you need a good headlight and tail light along with lots of reflective or day-glo clothing on or you will end up getting hit by a car. So take your pick: hit by a car or stabbed. Quite frankly just being on a public street at night does not mean you are any safer than the bike path. The only difference is that there are at least people on the street that will see you. Not so much on the bike path after dark.

Body found on bike path
By Pamela Hale-Burns, Staff Writer
Posted: 12/10/2008
http://www.presstelegram.com/ci_11191073?source=rss_viewed

LONG BEACH - A 28-year-old Long Beach man was found stabbed to death on the bicycle path along the Los Angeles River flood control channel near the 1600 block of San Francisco Avenue on Tuesday night.

Long Beach police officers responded to an unidentified 911 caller who reported a wounded man on the east side of the flood channel, some 250 yards south of Pacific Coast Highway, about 8:40 p.m., according to an Long Beach Police Department statement.

When police arrived, they found a man's body, police officials said. He had apparently died from being stabbed in the upper body.

LBPD Sgt. David Marander said no additional details were available Wednesday. He directed queries to the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office, which did not release the victim's name, pending notification of his next of kin.

Anyone with information on the crime was asked to call LBPD homicide detectives Dennis Robbins and Daniel Mendoza at 562-570-7244.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

December 10, 2008

Sheriff Baca road trip to the Inauguration

I really hope Sheriff Baca is kidding. Really the best thing we could have happen is Obama appointing a new Sheriff for LA County that actually has some intelligence. When you read this story below think to yourself..how is it that you (not me) voted for this guy. Does he not think anything through? I suppose next he will offer to have then all drive new hybrid LASD cars (at taxpayer expense) and five days salary (with rolling road closures for them of course) just like the recent PR stunt by the auto execs driving to Washington DC. Lets call this for what it is Baca. The 347 deputies won the lottery in the Dept. for going back to get front row seats at the hottest event this year. And where will they sleep? All the hotels are booked. I suppose we can rent 5 floors at the Ritz Carlton DC at taxpayer expense. And I am sure Baca himself will not miss it! Cant wait to see that expense report. Then I read things like this and realize this whole scheme probably seems rational to Baca.

L.A. County sheriff's plan to send deputies to inauguration is questioned
Baca wants to fly 347 deputies back east. But some officials wonder if the cost will be too high and if the deputies aren't needed in the county.

By Molly Hennessy-Fiske and Richard Winton

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-sheriff10-2008dec10,0,100128,full.story
From the Los Angeles Times

December 10, 2008

The request was straightforward, even flattering. Send a few hundred Los Angeles County sheriff's deputies across the country next month to assist Washington, D.C., police at the presidential inauguration.

It's the price tag of $1.6 million -- with as much as $1 million coming from the county -- that has given some top officials indigestion.

"We're not in a position to police other cities, as worthy as this is," Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky said Tuesday. "This is not an emergency. This is not Katrina, this is not a hurricane or a natural disaster."

Sheriff Lee Baca, in a letter dated Tuesday, asked county supervisors to approve plans to charter a plane and fly 347 deputies to Washington, where they would work for four days. A decision was postponed until next week's meeting.

At issue is who will ultimately pay for what.

Everyone agrees that Washington police would pick up the tab for $533,000 in airfare and $97,000 in per diem expenses, but that amount accounts for only a portion of the costs.

County officials estimate that they would be on the hook for another $905,000 in salary and benefits. In addition, there is $81,000 in needed "cold weather gear" including jackets, gloves, hats and "turtleneck dickies," at a cost of $232 per deputy. (LAAG: I guess we have to buy them little mittens too as they dont have any. give me a break)

Baca said Tuesday that concern about repayment is "much ado about nothing." (LAAG: yes as anything taxpayers say is trivial)

"The reality is the county will pay nothing for this," he said, adding that the questions raised about costs are coming as he is still in negotiations with Washington police and the inaugural committee.

Baca said that providing mutual aid was good policy, adding that earthquake-prone Los Angeles may one day need the favor returned.

Baca's spokesman, Steve Whitmore, said Tuesday that although D.C. police requested several hundred deputies, so far they have offered to reimburse the salaries of only 40.

The Sheriff's Department agreed to foot the cost of winter weather gear because it will be used again by deputies working in colder parts of the county, Whitmore said. (LAAG: so they dont have their own jackets...never had cold weather in CA efore this)

"What the sheriff has said is the department is willing to provide the deputies requested, but they will have to pay all of their salaries," Whitmore said. Some 64 deputies worked the 2004 Bush inaugural, with the costs reimbursed by the Washington, D.C., Metro Police Department.

Even if the entire cost of the trip is covered, Yaroslavsky and Supervisor Michael Antonovich said they would have trouble approving it.

"The sheriff's first responsibility is to the citizens of Los Angeles County, to ensure that we have adequate protection at any time of day," Antonovich said. "If they need additional personnel on the East Coast, then they need to utilize personnel on the East Coast." (LAAG: Uh yeah..brilliant..lets not fly 3500 miles to help when people 50 miles away can help..)

Another concern -- despite assurances from the sheriff that those sent would come from "non-emergency" positions -- is whether the county would incur additional overtime costs for deputies needed to backfill for those in Washington. (LAAG: Since when does the Sheriff Dept. worry about overtime...how do you expect Deputies to buy those new boats they need)

"We have a fiscal crisis on our hands and an even worse one looming on the horizon. Our job is to husband our resources," Yaroslavsky said.

It was unclear Tuesday whether there were enough votes on the five-member board to permit the plan to go forward when it comes up again next week.

Supervisor Gloria Molina declined to comment on the matter through a spokeswoman. A spokesman for Supervisor Don Knabe said his boss was undecided, as was Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas.

"There are clearly pros and cons to doing so," Ridley-Thomas said. "The question in the final analysis is whether the sheriff and other proponents can persuade the board that this is a defensible thing to do."

The call for help went out weeks ago, said Traci Hughes of the Washington, D.C., police.

"We are expecting historical crowd numbers and there are numerous [inaugural] ball sites" that have to be secured, Hughes said. "Keep in mind too that we have to ensure that people can get in and out of the city. So there will be officers manning traffic posts and just a variety of things."

As of Tuesday, 96 law enforcement agencies had promised to supply 4,000 additional staff for the inauguration, effectively doubling the ranks of the Washington, D.C., department, Hughes said. Several West Coast law enforcement agencies were approached, she said. Hughes declined to say which ones, citing security concerns. (LAAG: I think the cat is out of the bag as we know how many LASD officers want to go; the crooks in LA will take notice and have one hell of an inauguartion party back in LA)

Los Angeles Police Department officials said Tuesday that they had not received any requests to provide officers for the inauguration. (LAAG: perhaps Baca asked DC to ask him for 347 officers!)

The department, however, does plan to send a small team of tactical commanders to the inauguration to observe crowd control.

Steve Remige, president of the Assn. of Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs, which represents rank-and-file deputies, said Tuesday that his members "are flattered that the inaugural committee believes Los Angeles deputy sheriffs are needed to provide security for the inauguration." (LAAG: of course the union wants to go. How silly)

But, he said, given the state's growing budget deficit, what could amount to a $1-million gift from the county seemed impractical at best.

"It might be the season for giving," Remige said, "but this is over the top."

Hennessy-Fiske and Winton are Times staff writers.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email