June 3, 2008

El Paso Texas County bans sale of aerial fireworks

We are posting this story below as it shows a few things. One that there are some politicians willing to stand up for common sense in the face of political opposition, and secondly to show that there is a "powerful fireworks lobby" at work in this country. (like that was a surprise). Drought conditions (and air pollution) will likely only worsen in CA over the coming decades. But one thing is for sure...we will still be selling and lighting fireworks.


El Paso Texas County Commissioners ban sale of aerial fireworks for 4th of July

http://www.kvia.com/Global/story.asp?S=8412384

Posted: June 2, 2008 11:23 AM

EL PASO, TX - The only way the county can ban the sale of aerial fireworks during Independence Day celebrations is if the county is in a drought. According to the Texas Forest Service's measurements, the county is facing drought conditions.

Monday, commissioners voted unanimously to ban the sale of fireworks with sticks and fins. Commissioner Miguel Teran wasn't at Mondays's meeting.

Before they voted, State Representative Inocente "Chente" Quintanilla told the court he learned the county had expressed interest in talking to the state about banning the sale of fireworks. Quintanilla says his office is currently drafting legislation that would prohibit the sale and use of fireworks within 500 feet of an unincorporated community, such as Montana Vista and Agua Dulce.

The state rep said to avoid clashes with the other 253 county leaders in the state and the powerful fireworks lobby, he's drafting it so it would only apply to El Paso County.

"It'll be ready in two weeks," Quintanilla told the court, saying at that time, he'll bring it to the county for commissioners' input.

TNT Fireworks Manger Fernando Viramontes told ABC-7 he's willing to work around the prohibition of aerial fireworks, but legislation regulating where to sell and use fireworks concerns him. Viramontes cited the numerous organizations, like sports and school groups, who sell fireworks and use part of the profits toward funding group activities. The firework stand manager thinks this could cut into their fundraising efforts.

The County Attorney's Office told commissioners if drought conditions improve before next week, it will notify the court about modifying the ban on aerial fireworks.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

May 29, 2008

Verizon Fios installation underway in North Lakewood CA

Verizon has finally started doing Fios installations in North Lakewood, the part of the city north of Hardwick St. that is controlled by the Bellflower Central Office on Oak St. LAAG has spoken with "Curt" the Director of "Verizon's FTTP Program, West Coast Region" in Newbury Park, CA. He advises that Fios will be ready for sign ups by Oct-Nov 2008 in both the SW quadrants (west of Bellflower Blvd. north of Hardwick, east of Lakewood Blvd and south of Flora Vista St.) and SE quadrants (east of Bellflower Blvd. north of Hardwick, west of the San Gabriel River and south of Flora Vista St.) of Lakewood (but likely only a small percentage of homes in those quadrants). At this point it looks like the SE quadrant will be the first quadrant wired. We spoke to Verizon engineers "on the ground" near Eastbrook and Allington on 5/29/08 and they confirmed placement is starting in that location and should be available within 2 months to homeowners in that area around Allington and Eastbrook. There is no orderly progression as to how the fios installation flows. It is based on permits and where engineering tells the installers to go. It does not necessarily run east to west or north to south or in any contiguous or progressive fashion. The first sign that you will be getting fios is the cable stringers that go behind your property to string the fiber under the existing copper cables. Once they string that "dark fiber" it then needs to be hooked up to trunk lines. Then they install the beige metal boxes on the street and hook it up. Hooking up to the boxes at the ends of the block seems to be the last step before they turn on your service and offer you a 'drop" to your house. (They place a door hanger on your door to tall you its available to you)

In addition Curt also advises that the Bellflower Central Office will be the better GPON technology. Their current BPON technology splits 622Mbps downstream and 155Mbps upstream among 32 users. GPON technology will allow Verizon to offer 2.4Gbps downstream and 1.2Gbps upstream among 32-64 users (eliminating ATM, making it also more efficient). Read more on that here.

For a map of the quadrant boundaries and installations so far click here. Please email us if you see verizon fios installations underway or if you have fios up and running in Lakewood and you are within the SE and SW quadrants outlined above.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

May 27, 2008

Sen. Feinstein wants perchlorate polluters to pay

I really don't think this is going to get anywhere. Like most mass pollution cases one company will blame all the others nearby. Still no one at EPA is looking at the spent residue washed off the street after the "safe and sane" fireworks are used. That is a possible source of perchlorate contamination as well, at least in the coastal waters where we have all the other run off pollution problems. That is also not even mentioning the horrible air pollution problem for the days surrounding July 4th due to legal "personal use" fireworks. It seems people that peddle fireworks get a free pass on air pollution (due to its "fund raising" factor) while everyone else runs out and buys a Prius and gets compact florescent bulbs to save the air. Politics.

Senator on the alert
Feinstein wants suspected polluters to pay up now
Jason Pesick, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 05/25/2008 10:46:13 PM PDT

RIALTO - Sen. Dianne Feinstein wants companies suspected of polluting the city's groundwater to pay for safe drinking water while a final cleanup strategy is devised.

"Given that identifying and implementing a final remedy will likely take several years, it is appropriate for the responsible parties to assume the burden of providing clean drinking water in the interim," the influential California Democrat recently wrote in a letter to the head of the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, D.C.

The water is contaminated with perchlorate, a chemical used to produce explosives like rocket fuel and fireworks.

"Seven years have gone by. The residents are squeezed to the limit," said Barry Groveman, a lawyer for the West Valley Water District, which provides almost all of the city's drinking water along with Rialto's water department.

The perchlorate and a toxic industrial cleaner have spread into underground water, though contaminated water is not served to residents. Perchlorate can interfere with the thyroid gland, which plays a role in metabolism and mental and physical development.

Rialto customers have a perchlorate surcharge on their water bills, and it costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to operate the treatment systems.

Groveman said the suspected polluters - Rialto has identified more than 40 - will be less likely to employ creative delay tactics as the state and EPA try to make them clean up the contamination if they must pay to provide clean water in the meantime.

In March, Feinstein wrote a letter to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson saying the agency should order suspected polluters to provide replacement water.

The replacement water is particularly important as Rialto tries to build new residential developments that need water services, said Rialto City Councilman Ed Scott.

"We have to have drinking water for the city," he said.

EPA officials have said they would like to use their resources to develop a cleanup plan, not to fight for replacement water.

"It's a question of priority and a question of what they would accomplish," said Wayne Praskins, the EPA project manager assigned to Rialto.

On May 13, Feinstein sent Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger a letter saying any settlement between state agencies and suspected polluters should include providing clean water.

The calls from Feinstein and Groveman for replacement water come amid rumors an agency is nearing completion of settlement talks with three of the suspected polluters.

The Riverside-based Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board is conducting the talks.

Kurt Berchtold, the board's assistant executive officer, would not comment on whether negotiators are seeking replacement water from the suspected polluters - Goodrich, the Black and Decker entity Emhart and Pyro Spectaculars.

But he did note that an earlier draft order from the board's staff included a call for replacement water at some wells.

Berchtold said he does not believe the board can order replacement water for wells contaminated with levels of perchlorate below the state standard of 6 parts per billion. Most of the West Valley wells are contaminated below that standard.

Groveman, the author of much of the relevant water code, did not concur.

"I respectfully disagree. These are more bureaucratic reasons not to do things," he said.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

May 23, 2008

Vallejo CA pulls the plug: Calpers holding the bag on 219 million in unfunded pension benfits

Well this is the shot that will be heard round the world. The question really is what kind of precedent will this set for other cities in the US and in Calif. to deal with the massive public employee pension problem. Like most issues the government deals with I smell a bailout. Taxpayers better grab their wallets and run. I think the time has come for the voters to become the city managers and to hold elections on the "pension giveaways". God knows the politicians cannot be trusted anymore with the public employee unions.


City of Vallejo, California files for bankruptcy
Fri May 23, 2008 5:03pm EDT
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2352179020080523

By Adam Tanner

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The city of Vallejo, California, filed for bankruptcy on Friday, a move signaled by its city council earlier this month as it struggles to avoid running out of money amid steep city personnel costs and sliding revenues from a housing slump.

The Chapter 9 filing by Vallejo, a blue-collar, former Navy town in the San Francisco Bay Area, in U.S. bankruptcy court in Sacramento had been expected since May 6, when the city council approved the drastic move.

Vallejo, with over 100,000 residents, is the first sizable city in California to file for bankruptcy. Chapter 9 is a bankruptcy filing for municipalities.

Although many California towns are coping with shrinking tax revenues and some of the highest home foreclosure rates in the nation, they are not likely to follow Vallejo's suit.

Moody's Investors Service said earlier this month that Vallejo's expected bankruptcy filing would be a "unique case."

The state's last bankruptcy filing was in 1994 when Orange County's finances ran aground on soured investments linked to derivatives.

LEVERAGE WITH EMPLOYEES?

According to the filing signed by City Manager Joseph Tanner, the city has 1,000 to 5,000 creditors, estimated assets of half a billion to $1 billion and liabilities of $100 million to $500 million. Tanner had previously said that the city's general fund would be depleted at the end of June.

Vallejo's main financial difficulty is the high spending on public safety employees, whose costs eat up three-quarters of the city's general fund.

Although the city reached a deal with employees in February for pay cuts and other short-term measures to keep paying bills, the city council said earlier this month that filing for bankruptcy might give it more leverage in talks with workers on wages and benefits.

A document accompanying the filing said that the California Public Employees Retirement System, the nation's largest pension fund, known as Calpers, held the largest unsecured claim, with $135.4 million in retiree health benefits, and another $83.9 million in unfunded pension plan benefits.

Wells Fargo Bank was a bond trustee with $27.3 million in unsecured claims, and the Union Bank of California with $26.2 million in unsecured claims, the document said.

(Reporting by Adam Tanner, writing by Mary Milliken; editing by Leslie Adler)

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

May 22, 2008

Buena Park restricts 'safe and sane' fireworks

It is a small concession but we would like to see a lot more of these types of "use" restrictions especially given the police costs "safe and sane" fireworks force cities to incur. And with many cities facing a "Vallejo dilemma" any budget cost that can be cut is welcomed, especially in the public safety arena as those costs are so inflated to begin with (for what you really get in terms of effectiveness).

Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Buena Park restricts 'safe and sane' fireworks
Residents will no longer get to light up on busy La Palma Avenue.
By SERENA MARIA DANIELS
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/fireworks-park-buena-2041950-year-city#

BUENA PARK – Residents wanting to light up fireworks this Fourth of July will face more restrictions after the city banned them on a strip of La Palma Avenue that's usually overrun with celebrants.

La Palma, between Western Avenue and El Monte Drive, has for years been home to as many as 3,000 people, all in the street, blocking traffic to get a spot to see the fireworks show at Knott's Berry Farm.

While they're waiting, many light up their own legal fireworks on the street, blocking traffic and creating safety hazards, said Buena Park police Sgt. William Kohanek.

"Congestion on this major thoroughfare is just overwhelming," Kohanek said.

Fireworks can be safely shot off on the city's other public streets.

City Councilmen Don McCay, Steve Berry and Mayor Jim Dow approved the restriction at Tuesday evening's meeting. Council members Patsy Marshall and Art Brown were not present.

Buena Park is one of five cities that allow so-called safe and sane fireworks; so do Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Garden Grove and Stanton.

Last year, Buena Park banned Piccolo Pete fireworks, in part because of noise complaints.

Fines have been imposed on people caught with illegal fireworks in Garden Grove.

Santa Ana officials, on the other hand, have tentatively agreed to extend operating hours for firework vendors. Stands would open an hour earlier – at 9 a.m. on July 2, 3 and 4. Santa Ana council members are expected to finalize the extended hours next month.

Buena Park's restriction comes a month after an Orange County grand jury report called for a three-year moratorium against fireworks in the five cities to allow time to find ways of improving public safety. The report says that county taxpayers paid about $188,000 last year for extra policing and fire services during the Fourth of July season.

But the report holds no legal authority.

Last year, Buena Park police responded to 240 firework-related calls on July 1-4.

Contact the writer: 714-704-3795 or sdaniels@ocregister.com

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

May 18, 2008

In California, unions have the upper hand and will eventually take over

This pretty much sums up the current situation with public unions and how they are contrasted with private unions. Again we are reaching a tipping point as the Vallejo potential bankruptcy all but too painfully points out. this is all about greed and control and "we want what they have" mentality. It has to come to an end sooner or later. The Housing crisis may bring it to a head quicker due to the shortfall in property tax revenue which will be hitting home soon. This is a showdown between the taxpayers and the "ruling elite"...the public employee unions, the spinless political hacks we let get elected and their pork barrel dog and pony show.

The trouble with unions
By MICHAEL HALEY
Napa Valley Register
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2008/05/18/opinion/michael_haley/doc482b723f46256162341736.txt

When I read the recent Register article about the service workers unions approaching the City Council for support in unionizing new hotel workers, all I could think was here comes trouble. I hope the City Council does not help them.

I think most people believe that unions counterbalance management in a sort of equal relationship, one side representing one point of view, the other another, and that it all balances out equally assuring fairness. But it is not an equal relationship, the unions soon grow to have more power than management and can control the entire situation to the point that the employer becomes harmed, even bankrupt.

Let me first of all say that often times unions have done a lot of good, so I am not necessarily opposed to them in total.

But there are two main reasons for unions having an unfair advantage that it is important for people to understand. This happens in both private unions and even more so in government.

The first reason is that labor unions all link together as a large unit, while the employers, be they government or private, have to act independently by law. If you can control the position of labor across a whole field of employment, say all the firefighters in the state acting together, then each individual local government is far out manned.

The second is that they are not a feature of a free marketplace, but are an invention of the government to control a free market place. Unions only exist because government laws and regulations mandate them. A marketplace, on the other hand, would exist whether the government regulated it or not.

What that means is that by taking away some of the freedom of employers and employees to freely associate on whatever terms they prefer, you lose economic efficiency. On an economic basis, there is just no way around it.

Vallejo's safety unions are a good example of how that harms us.

The salaries they have negotiated are a shocker they are so high, yet they have refused to negotiate and caused the city to go into bankruptcy. And yet they still won‚t negotiate, they have no incentive to do so. And there is little that the city can do about it. In a non-union environment, Vallejo would have cut salaries, benefits, rearranged work schedules and a number of other things that would have saved the city through tough times. The same thing any household would do when budgets were tight.

The lesson? Union contracts cause the management of a company or government to lose control of the very thing they are supposed to run. And the unions have no responsibility to manage it themselves, even though they control it.

Of course, the automotive companies are yet another example where union demands and economically unfeasible contracts could not be gotten out of and they have bankrupted the entire auto industry in America. And which automaker has risen to the top and avoided all this? Toyota, which does not have unions.

Because unions are a government regulatory creation, they are slow to respond to changing economic circumstances, if at all. The only real control over them is whatever the employer can exert.

An employer, be that the government or private, has an organic limit on its behavior. A company has to please its customers or it will go out of business. The government is limited by what it can extract from taxpayers.

But the unions have no organic limit built into their economic system. The company or government can go bust and the unions can remain unaffected. We have seen that with both Vallejo and the auto industry. They are only limited by moral suasion and whatever the management can convince them to do.

The auto industry could have chosen to keep their prices high, but if customers won't buy that is it, they are done. On the other hand, if General Motors had just decided not to pay their union workers as much, they would have been hauled into court and fined.

This is an incredibly important point for the public to understand about unions, because this is not about whether anyone or I likes them or not, it is about the way economic reality functions. There is an organic limit built into what a government or company can do, but there is no limit built into what a union can do. Therein lies the problem.

If you doubt this, all you have to do is look at what has happened. The auto industry, Vallejo, state worker pension and medical benefit unfunded liabilities, the fact that the city of Napa is mandated to pay a salary rate based on bankrupt Vallejo salaries even when it makes no sense, these are all things that no one would do unless mandated by law.

The fact is that the way the system is structured, especially in California, unions automatically have the upper hand and they eventually will take over. This is pretty much what has already happened to the California state legislature. Lets not encourage this in Napa.


Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

May 10, 2008

Executive order regarding fireworks

Oh yes by all means get those illegal fireworks...the safe and sane ones could never cause fires, especially when modified...heaven forbid we eliminated person fireworks now that we are headed into a long term drought...

05/09/2008
EXECUTIVE ORDER S-03-08
by the Governor of the State of California
http://gov.ca.gov/index.php?/executive-order/9546/

WHEREAS last year California experienced devastating wildfires that destroyed lives, property, businesses, and the environment and resulted in the largest deployment of firefighting resources and the highest number of evacuations in state history; and

WHEREAS this year, California once again finds itself facing an imminent threat of devastating wildfires and imminent peril to people and property; and

WHEREAS the number of dead, dying and diseased trees continues to increase as a result of bark beetle infestation in Southern California, providing a readily available fuel load which creates an imminent threat of catastrophic fires; and....

[snip]

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of the State of California, in accordance with the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the State of California, do hereby issue the following orders to become effective immediately:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) shall secure and deploy additional resources that are necessary, as determined by the Director, to protect the safety of persons and property from wildfires during periods of elevated fire risk as follows:

[snip]

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that CAL FIRE develop and implement aggressive interdiction plans for the enforcement of laws regarding arson and illegal and dangerous fireworks, focusing on high traffic, high impact, high volume distribution and transportation points which may be the sources for the ignition of wildland fires in California.

[snip]

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

Orange County Grand Jury Report on "safe and sane" Fireworks

The OC Grand Jury report calls the permitting process for fireworks sales "flawed" and finds that taxpayers are required to foot the bill – last year about $188,000 – for extra police and fire services during the Fourth of July season.

Grand Jury report said police and fire officials said that they are often overwhelmed by fireworks-related calls for service during the Fourth of July season and some neighborhoods resemble "war zones" during that time. The full report can be read here

Basically the fireworks sellers and the cities want local control as it makes it much easier for the fireworks companies and the teams and clubs that benefit from them to make this look like a grass roots populist campaign when in reality all it is is "astroturfing" which is activity which seeks to create the impression of being spontaneous, grassroots behavior, hence the reference to the artificial grass AstroTurf. The goal of such a campaign is to disguise the efforts of a political or commercial entity as an independent public reaction to some political entity—a politician, political group, product, service or event. Astroturfers attempt to orchestrate the actions of apparently diverse and geographically distributed individuals, by both overt ("outreach", "awareness", etc.) and covert (disinformation) means. Astroturfing may be undertaken by anything from an individual pushing one's own personal agenda through to highly organized professional groups with financial backing from large corporations, non-profits, or activist organizations. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing)

One mayor quoted below noted “There seems to be a lot of attention paid to the fact that it’s a fundraising mechanism, but it’s also an American tradition,” he added. Of course what he failed to point out was that all of the "astro-turfers" only use the "tradition" as cover for what they really want; a quick way to raise some loot (while polluting th environment and raiding city coffers for extra police presence). This is all very transparent.

Published Saturday, April 26, 2008 9:50 PM PDT
Public safety
July 4 safety discussed
Costa Mesa officials pass on proposal to suspend sales of legal fireworks. City resembles ‘war zone’ on the holiday, some say.

By Chris Caesar

Reaction to an Orange County Grand Jury report calling for a three-year moratorium on the sale of “safe and sane” fireworks in Costa Mesa for the Fourth of July has been lukewarm with elected officials saying they would not hear or endorse the proposal — at least for this year.

Five Orange County cities, including Costa Mesa, permit the regulated use and sale of “sane and safe” fireworks endorsed by the state Fire Marshall, which has led to some friction between the cities and their neighbors.

Some officials say the cities resemble a “war zone” on the Fourth of July, and that even the use of legal fireworks contributes to the holiday’s chaotic atmosphere and a significant increase in the use of their illegal counterparts.

Sports teams and extracurricular groups, however, sell the items as part of their annual fundraising drives, leading some city officials to be wary of banning the practice outright.

Mayor Eric Bever, who reviewed a rough draft of the report prior to its final publication, said he would favor a “local control” approach to fireworks regulation, noting the city has its own internal task force to improve fireworks safety.

“I know the state, feds, county and everyone else wants to mandate everything, but I think that the local people should have as much control as possible in regards to their destiny,” he said. “We’re working toward finding ways of managing fireworks more efficiently, and we’ve had our task force out in the field on the Fourth of July in the last three years. I think people are getting the idea that they won’t get away with illegal fireworks anymore.”

“There seems to be a lot of attention paid to the fact that it’s a fundraising mechanism, but it’s also an American tradition,” he added. “Certainly there are people who are disrupted by illegal fireworks — I count myself among them — but I don’t think that killing off an American tradition is the way to solve that problem.”

Councilwoman Wendy Leece said the city can become a “war zone” on the holiday and that she sympathized with the city’s fire and police departments during their heightened patrols on the Fourth of July.

Yet, she also said that personal responsibility and citizens working together would be the only force that would enhance safety, and that any moratorium should be implemented with local groups in mind.

“Putting a moratorium on our fireworks sales this year would be a hardship for organizations which depend on this money for their programs,” she said. “However, if things are worse this year in our city, I will support some type of a moratorium for next year.”

Costa Mesa resident and mother Linda Schwandt said that she frequently participates and donates to fundraisers supporting local youth, and said she would feel bad if the proposed moratorium hindered their activities.

But, assuming they are given ample time to reorganize their efforts, she thought it may be worth a shot.

“I think that would be pretty fair,” she said. “Let the numbers speak for themselves.”

The City Council will provide direction to staff in regards to a list of suggestions generated by city staff during its scheduled May 6 meeting, though Bever said it would be unlikely the city would take up any formal discussion of the grand jury’s recommendations.

Attempts to reach a representative of the Orange County Grand Jury were unsuccessful.

CHRIS CAESAR may be reached at (714) 966-4626 or at chris.caesar@latimes.com.


Thursday, April 24, 2008
Update: Grand jury says cities that allow fireworks sales should stop
Report calls on 5 cities that permit 'safe and sane' fireworks sales to enact 3-year moratorium for safety's sake.
By ERIC CARPENTER
The Orange County Register
Comments 41 | Recommend 4

SANTA ANA The Orange County Grand Jury released a report Thursday calling for the five Orange County cities that allow the sale of fireworks to temporarily ban such sales – adding fuel to a debate that's flared for years.

The Grand Jury recommended the cities – Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Garden Grove, Santa Ana and Stanton – adopt at least a three-year moratorium on fireworks sales to improve public safety.

That recommendation quickly met with resistance from some city officials who have been dealing with the issue for years.

Supporters of so-called "safe and sane" fireworks say they are a good fundraiser for community groups and are a tradition for families who, in most cases, use them responsibly.

The Grand Jury report calls the permitting process for fireworks sales "flawed" and finds that taxpayers are required to foot the bill – last year about $188,000 – for extra police and fire services during the Fourth of July season.

Grand Jury Foreman Ann Avery Andres said police and fire officials told the jury that they are often overwhelmed by fireworks-related calls for service during the Fourth of July season and some neighborhoods resemble "war zones" during that time.

Allowing the sale of legal fireworks – those that don't explode or fly through the air – appears to contribute to the use of illegal fireworks, she added.

"Three years is what law enforcement officials determined would be an optimum time to change the culture of firework use and curb the use of illegal fireworks," said Grand Jury member Bill Guidas, of Yorba Linda.

Last year, Costa Mesa assigned an additional 20 police officers and firefighters on July 4 and responded to 272 calls for service.

"We get bombarded every year with fireworks calls," said Costa Mesa police Lt. Paul Dondero.

The Grand Jury report has no enforcement teeth; cities won't be required to make any changes to existing laws. Officials from each city are expected to file a written response within 60 days.

Garden Grove Councilman Mark Rosen didn't hesitate when he heard the recommendation for a three-year ban.

"Not going to happen," Rosen said. "Part of it is that it's a good fund-raiser (and) it is a tradition that families enjoy being able to have, fireworks in front of their homes. I'll continue to support fireworks."

Last October, the Garden Grove council delayed a vote on whether to let voters decide whether fireworks should be banned until after the coming July Fourth holiday.

"We put some heavy fines in place recently for unlawful use of fireworks, and we want to see how that plays out first," Rosen said.

Costa Mesa City Manager Allan Roeder said the city has tightened its regulation over the years and limited the number of booths allowed to sell fireworks to 40.

More regulations, unrelated to the Grand Jury report, are scheduled to come before the council May 6, Roeder said.

Buena Park Councilman Art Brown said his city is chaotic on July 4 and city crews are left to clean up the debris.

"Personally, I would like to see fireworks banned and to have the city provide a free fireworks show for the citizens to view," he said.

But because voters there decided in 2004 to allow the sale of fireworks, the Buena Park council would likely take no further action, he said.

The full report is available online at www.ocgrandjury.org.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

May 8, 2008

Pit Bull attacks

This is just another sign of slow collapse of a neighborhood into a ghetto like slum. Why do people need 5 dogs of any breed. They don't. Oh and I am sure these 5 dogs never barked much. And I'll bet the yard looked and smelled great. People that own these types of dogs always say they are gentile and sweet, great around kids etc. What they fail to forget is that they are fighting dogs and are bred for fighting. They also have large mouths and very powerful locking jaws. They never will be like golden retrievers. Period. These dog owners should be prosecuted in some fashion. Also it seems to me that the animal control officer was not well trained going after 5 pit bulls alone. A "two year" "veteran". What? Does not take a rocket scientist to figure that things could go really wrong on this assignment...picking up 5 pit bulls. Not the same and catching ONE stray poodle.

Pit bull mauls animal control officer
From wire reports
Article Launched: 05/08/2008 07:16:41 AM PDT

An animal control officer suffered injuries to his legs and an arm when he was mauled Wednesday by a pit bull at a Lakewood home, authorities said.

The officer, 28, a two-year veteran with the Southeast Area Animal Control Authority, will undergo surgery for his injuries at Long Beach Memorial Hospital, according to Aaron Reyes, the authority's director of operations.

``The biggest concern is infection,'' Reyes said. ``He has a break in his knuckle; his third knuckle is facing upward. His wounds are deep and they are tear-type wounds as well. They're watching for nerve damage and infection. We're on pins and needles just hoping that he does fine.''

The officer went to the home in the 6100 block of Briercrest Avenue at noon to speak with the residents about having too many pit bulls. Authority records show prior violations over the number of dogs kept in the residence.

The dog owner had agreed to relinquish custody of three of the five pit bulls on the property. When the officer attempted to capture the dogs, one ``changed its friendly demeanor'' and attacked him, Reyes said.

``This is a sad day for this officer, who has been hurt very badly simply trying to do his job,'' Reyes said.

The attacking dog will be tested by the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services for rabies. The four other pit bulls on the property will be euthanized.

Anyone with information on the case is asked to call the authority's Investigation
Advertisement
Division at (562) 803-3301, Ext. 224.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

Taxation Without Representation

As Vallejo readies for Bankruptcy due to public employee salaries, LBReport.com did an article today on Logn Beach's action regarding public employees costs noting: "...Almost all of LB's Councilmembers voted to obligate LB taxpayers to incur at least $26.5 million in General Fund costs over the next five years to provide raises and add'l benefits in separate contracts with LB's non-public-safety city employees and firefighters. The Council majority did so despite a continuing structural deficit, declining property tax revenues...and multi-million dollar increases previously granted by the Council for the LB Police Officers' contract...."

Last week LBReport.com did an editorial on the mess in advance of this story. You can read it here. It looks like the same old pattern is repeated over and over endlessly..they got a raise so now we want one.

LAAG responded to the LBReport editorial as follows:

Subject: "Taxation Without Representation"

What an appropriate picture. Here is the wikipedia link for your readers that goes with the picture and to learn a little history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_taxation_without_representation LAAG has been fed up with local politicians pandering to public employee unions. We started this crusade before the mainstream media got on board. At first it was limited to giveaways to "public safety" employees. Now its the full spectrum of public employees with no end in site. The problem is that all these giveaways are done in "plain view" yet concealed from most taxpayers. We need more info on the internet. More disclosure. More timely. Easier to find. The other thing that need to be done is we need to start telling private sector employees what employees like them are making for less work, less skill, less education and less hours. Once taxpayers see that then they will get angry and throw out the politicians that hide or fail to fix the problems. Check out our site for details www.LAAG.us as well as http://www.pensiontsunami.com/ and this little gem courtesy of the Sacramento Bee (what a great paper; sort of like LB Report on steroids) http://www.laag.us/2008/03/want-to-know-what-state-employees-make.html


Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email