September 9, 2006

Pollution Concerns May Lower the Boom on Offshore Fireworks

SeaWorld San Diego has suspended its shows and plans to seek a discharge permit. Beach cities fear additional costs of more regulations.
By Seema Mehta and Jennifer Delson
LA Times Staff Writers

September 9, 2006

Fears that major fireworks shows may be polluting the Pacific Ocean could dampen pyrotechnics displays along the California coast.

A threatened lawsuit by an environmental group prompted SeaWorld San Diego to scrap its fireworks shows for the rest of the year, and beach cities are wondering if heightened scrutiny by state regulators will make fireworks for the Fourth of July and other traditional celebrations too expensive to support.

Environmentalists "are pushing the envelope and, yes, it will be troublesome for any agency firing over water," said Dusty Crane, spokesman for the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors, which shoots fireworks off Marina del Rey for Independence Day, the annual Christmas boat parade and New Year's Eve.

Any new fireworks regulations are "definitely going to make it more difficult, and it's going to be more costly, and it could end them," Crane said.

Federal and state environmental regulators said they know of no previous regulatory efforts regarding fireworks and water pollution, aside from a 2003 study of Lake Tahoe that resulted in no action.

"It's an unusual circumstance," said Nancy Woo, associate director of the water division for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's regional office. "On first blush, I was, like, 'Whoa, that's a good question.' "

SeaWorld amusement park has more than 120 fireworks displays annually, shot off a barge in Mission Bay.

San Diego Coastkeeper has grown increasingly concerned about the displays' cumulative effect on the water and the sediment in the bay, said Marco Gonzalez, attorney for the environmental organization.

On June 26, Coastkeeper notified SeaWorld that it intended to sue the park for violating the federal Clean Water Act, alleging that its fireworks displays shower harmful heavy metals and chemicals into the bay, and that it never applied for a state permit to discharge such pollutants into the water.

"The incremental impacts from long-term fireworks displays are something we know nothing about," Gonzalez said.

SeaWorld decided Aug. 20 to suspend its fireworks and plans to apply for a discharge permit from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board by month's end, said SeaWorld spokesman Dave Koontz. He said the park does not agree with the allegations or the contention that a permit is required under the Clean Water Act.

"But in light of the fact they intended to file a lawsuit against us, we decided the most appropriate course of action was to suspend the fireworks," he said.

Koontz said the park takes steps to deal with pollution, sending out a crew in a boat after each display to pick up paper debris. The next morning, workers scour the beaches off SeaWorld and Fiesta Island for debris that may have washed ashore.

Additionally, he said, the California Coastal Commission has required the park to monitor the waters of Mission Bay for the past five years, and the data show that the fireworks have not had an impact. "We feel we're extremely responsible in how we conduct our fireworks operation," he said.

Fireworks also release metals such as copper ­ which creates the color green ­ and chemicals such as perchlorate, which is used in detonation.

John Robertus, executive officer of the regional water board, said a review of SeaWorld's permit application would take six months to a year. As part of that review, the agency will investigate the bay's water and sediments to ensure that pollutants from the fireworks are not affecting the ecosystem and will look at the effects of the sound on birds that nest in Mission Bay, a stopover on the Pacific Flyway.

If the agency determines that fireworks over the ocean should be regulated, Robertus envisions a multitiered approach. Cities and organizations that shoot off fireworks once or twice a year might receive a waiver; a general state permit might be issued to those who sponsor several shows a year; and entities that hold them frequently, such as SeaWorld, might be required to apply for a permit that includes extensive environmental monitoring.

"The SeaWorld problem is perhaps a little more unique than other fireworks displays because it occurs 120 times on an annual basis," Robertus said, "and it takes place over the water in Mission Bay, and Mission Bay does not have good circulation and it's quite shallow."

Peter Douglas, executive director of the California Coastal Commission, said his agency also could require those who put on fireworks displays to obtain a coastal development permit.

Though regulatory agencies had not considered fireworks in the past, he said, they ought to, given the increased knowledge about the cumulative impact of pollutants. "We have to elevate our level of concern," he said.

Coastkeeper hopes the action brings increased scrutiny to all fireworks celebrations in the state.

"The Clean Water Act is very clear: Any discharge of pollutants … into waters of the United States requires a permit, and the mere fact that fireworks are tied to our patriotic Fourth of July celebrations is not an exemption under the Clean Water Act," he said.

Julie L. Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Assn. in Bethesda, Md., called the possible regulatory action "absurd," and said fireworks pose little environmental risk.

"Fireworks are designed to burst and be consumed in the sky. They burn by combustion. We are not directly discharging or emitting chemicals into the water stream," Heckman said. "This is another attempt of the environmentalists' extreme let's-just-ban-everything. This industry has been under such regulatory scrutiny since 9/11. At some point, it has just got to stop or Americans are not going to see fireworks ever again."

Cities that play host to fireworks displays also are concerned that more bureaucracy means more costs.

Renee Dunn, spokeswoman for the Port of San Francisco, which hosts a handful of fireworks annually in the bay, said permits "would be a huge problem for us. It would create quite a glitch for festivities in San Francisco."

Laurie Payne, community information officer for Huntington Beach, said that volunteers were already stretched thin, raising $50,000 annually for the Fourth of July display off the pier. "It sounds like an additional expense. Any added expense would be difficult because … it would be more of a burden on the volunteer group," she said.

In San Diego, Alex Raugust said he learned that SeaWorld's fireworks were halted as he was waiting for the show in his Point Loma backyard with his young cousins.

"I thought, 'What a nice treat for these young kids.' Instead, what they learned about was our litigious society. I was kind of disgusted," he said. "The SeaWorld fireworks are like a summer tradition in San Diego, and it's kind of a perk of living in this area. It's like a nightcap at the end of the evening."

seema.mehta@latimes.com
jennifer.delson@latimes.com




No comments: