August 8, 2007

Way to go Costa Mesa....Deny the voters!

Apparently the Bush administration is rubbing off on the Costa Mesa city council who felt that it was their prerogative to deny the taxpayers their day at the polls. Kind of ironic when what were talking about is Independence Day and the Declaration of Independence

Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Costa Mesa fireworks ban smothered
City Council votes to keep a fireworks ban off of the November 2008 ballot.
By NIYAZ PIRANI
The Orange County Register

COSTA MESA A proposal to have Costa Mesa residents decide on the November 2008 ballot whether the sale of "safe and sane" fireworks should be allowed in the city was extinguished Tuesday in a 3-2 vote.

Councilwoman Linda Dixon put the item on the agenda after hearing residents complain about fireworks at numerous council meetings. She recommended that it was time to give the public a choice in the matter.

"Fireworks are not sane and are not safe," Eastside resident Judy Lindsay said. "I wonder what catastrophic event we're waiting for to realize that we need changes."

Dixon drafted a two-pronged approach that would have the public vote on the sale of fireworks and also place a 2 percent increase on the Costa Mesa transient occupancy tax – a fee charged to people who stay in the city's hotels – as a way of backfilling the income generated by firework sales.

Bill Pfeifer, a Northside resident and pit director for the Newport Harbor High School marching band, said fireworks help fund items including uniforms and instruments.

"Without that money, you can't go to tournaments, you can't compete," he said. "You don't have a band."

Councilwoman Wendy Leece said she wasn't ready to take funding away from youth sports, another beneficiary of the sales, without first finding an alternative means of generating revenue.

Councilman Eric Bever said he was also concerned that a higher tax could send visitors "down the street." He said he didn't want to make decisions regarding the occupancy tax if local businesses had not weighed in.

Leece, Bever and Mayor Allan Mansoor voted the proposal down.

Contact the writer: 714-445-6689 or npirani@ocregister.com

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™




August 6, 2007

Who in the private sector retires on 70 to $100,000 per year?

Really it does not matter if the liabilities are funded or not. (Long Beach claims they are) Quite frankly I dont trust the accounting shenanigans of most government entities, especially when we are looking at 40-50 years out from now on these pension liabilities. Lets keep this wave going and put taxpayers back in charge. Once they start seeing what public employees are getting and they aren't the sentiment will change, no matter if public employees are heroes or not.


Deflating big pensions
LB Press Telegram
http://www.presstelegram.com/opinions/ci_6545873
Article Launched: 08/04/2007 05:56:29 PM PDT

Orange County's challenge could help shrink deficits throughout California.

There has been a lot of angst but little action about costly government pensions, but that changed abruptly last week in Orange County. A local confrontation there could affect public employees throughout the state, and save taxpayers billions of dollars at the expense of public employees.

Orange County supervisors, at the instigation of one of them, John Moorlach, voted to test the constitutionality of big pension increases given in 2001 to county employees. If they prevail, the county would be off the hook for up to $550 million over the next 30 years in unfunded pension liabilities.

It also would mean that other cities, counties and the state would be in a similar position, of having passed out big pension benefits that amounted to illegal gifts of public funds.

The theory advanced by Moorlach, and supported by constitutional scholar John Eastman of Chapman University Law School, is that Orange County acted illegally when it granted a big pension increase effective retroactively, not in the sense that already-retired employees would get the increase (they didn't), but that employees would be getting an increase they hadn't
Advertisement
earned for past service, as well as an increase for future service.

Moorlach also argued that the increase violated debt limits, since it was unfunded, and amounted to a gift of public funds, since it was unearned by past service. Although the pension increases had been made permissible by state legislation, the way they were implemented was wrong.

A wave of pension increases throughout California followed that legislation, and created pension liabilities of billions of dollars. In Orange County, as in Long Beach and most other cities and counties as well as state government, public-safety employees got pensions of "3 at 50," meaning that an employee could retire at age 50 with a pension of 3 percent of the highest salary for every year of service.

Many cities and counties, Long Beach among them, followed up with fat pension increases for non-public safety employees as well, some so overly generous an employee could actually retire with a pension bigger than his or her salary.

Most of these aren't backed with a plan to pay for them, although Long Beach's pension liabilities are well funded. Orange County's are not.

If the names of Moorlach and Eastman seem familiar, it's for good reason. In the 1990s, Moorlach was derided as a Chicken Little until the skies did fall in with the bankruptcy of Orange County because of risky investments. He went on to be appointed and elected county treasurer, then county supervisor (his license plate reads SKYFELL). Eastman has involved himself in land-condemnation issues in Long Beach.

Now Moorlach is warning that pensions in Orange County are so far out of line they again could bankrupt the county. Eastman, who is dean of the Chapman University law school, says he thoroughly agrees with Moorlach's points about the pensions' questionable legality.

Rescinding the public-safety pension increases in Orange County would mean a 30 percent cut for employees of the Sheriff's Department, where a retiree now gets an average of $70,000. Another way out of the problem would be for employees to pay for the pension enhancements.

If it turns out the pension increases are constitutional, Moorlach and others seem determined to do something about pension costs Orange County can't afford to pay.

Either way, Moorlach and his colleagues will have done a great service for taxpayers of his county, and, we hope, throughout the state.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™




August 5, 2007

Arnie the "democrat" vs the spendaholics

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-op-whalen5aug05,0,6174605.story?coll=la-sunday-commentary
From the Los Angeles Times

GOP vs. the governor
Schwarzenegger has let down Republicans, so we're back to the familiar show of legislators feuding with a governor from their own party.
By By Bill Whalen

August 5, 2007

Acalifornia governor at odds with legislators from his own party isn't breaking news. Rather, it's the same old soap opera -- not that anyone would dare mistake the politicos in Sacramento for "The Bold and the Beautiful."

Before Arnold Schwarzenegger's arrival in the Capitol, Gray Davis and legislative Democrats feuded about whose job it was to implement whose vision. Before him, Pete Wilson denounced uncooperative Republicans as "irrelevant" for saying "no" to a budget fix.

So the summertime rift between Schwarzenegger (who backs the Assembly-passed budget) and 14 GOP senators (who are holding out for $1 billion less in state spending) that has kept California without a spending plan past the July 1 deadline is history repeated. To pass the budget with the required two-thirds majority, at least one more Senate Republican must approve it.

Only there's a wrinkle. The spat is about more than whether or not another billion dollars gets spent; it highlights the Republican Party's struggle to find a direction and be a driving force in state politics. And it speaks volumes about Schwarzenegger's failure to control spending -- which has increased by nearly one-third in the last four years and shows no sign of slowing -- and to change Sacramento's way of doing business.

Give Schwarzenegger credit for trying to slow global warming, pushing stem cell research and favoring domestic partnerships for gays and lesbians -- all stands that many Republicans run from yet a majority of Californians support. Part of his legacy will be that of a governor who on some issues was years, if not a generation, ahead of his party.

But it has come at a price. As the fourth anniversary of the recall election approaches, the 14 holdout senators -- call them the "Benedict Arnolds" in the budget revolt -- have cast their lot with the Republican runner-up in that 2003 contest, state Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks). He is a grim, by-the-book social and fiscal conservative -- an all-purpose scold to Schwarzenegger's upbeat glad-handing. He's also the anti-Arnold in another sense: McClintock has never won statewide office. In short, he represents the same set-in-stone conservatism that led to Republican defeats in the 1998 and 2002 gubernatorial races.

For die-hard conservatives, the GOP's Gang of 14 is the movie "300" come to life -- if you believe that defending the pass at Thermopylae and causing the budget impasse in Sacramento are one and the same. Yet the defense of fiscal conservatism doesn't come across as all that heroic.

That's because the messaging needs work.

Consider what happened after the GOP caucus, in late July, proposed $300 million in welfare cuts to help balance the state's books. On paper, the idea was to limit grants for noncompliant recipients, fleeing felons and noncitizens. But on the nightly news, the face was that of a welfare recipient who didn't look felonious, just plain scared. You decide who wins that PR exercise.

To gain the upper hand in next year's budget deliberations, Republicans need to do a better -- and earlier -- job of educating the public on the sillier aspects of Sacramento budgeting. For example, the Assembly-approved budget funds thousands of state jobs that the Legislature has already eliminated. By spotlighting such foolishness, the GOP would be in a stronger position to drive the budget conversation.

But state Republicans need to do more than improve their tactics. They must devise a winning strategy for the much larger war of ideas.

In the national GOP contest to succeed President Bush, "compassionate conservative" isn't part of the dialogue. Instead, the Republican hopefuls are trying their best to channel Ronald Reagan. The problem is that none of the leading candidates represents an ideological movement, as did Reagan.

State Republicans will face a similar situation when they choose their next gubernatorial nominee. In the conservative-dominated primary in 2010, no GOP candidate will embrace Schwarzenegger's idea of "post-partisanship." But there is no winning alternative philosophy in a Democratic-leaning state, other than being the party of "no" on the budget and most matters that look even vaguely progressive.

This is not to suggest that divorce proceedings are underway between the governor and his conservative Republican "friends" in the Legislature. A reconciliation of sorts will occur once Schwarzenegger starts issuing vetoes that anger Democrats, such as his refusal to go along with same-sex marriage. And perhaps the healing will extend into next year, especially if Schwarzenegger revisits public employee pension reform and takes on the teachers union over merit pay as part of education reform.

But there would probably be no spat between the governor and his party -- nor a budget impasse, for that matter -- if Schwarzenegger had delivered on his promise not to spend more than the state takes in. That, and his other promises to change Sacramento's ways: legislation written without any hearing, state budgets chock full of fuzzy math and phony economic assumptions and a Capitol still hostage to gridlock and partisan preening.

It's an irony hard to overlook: The star of "Hercules in New York" most likely will leave office in January 2011 having failed to clean out Sacramento's Augean stables of underperformance, waste and shady political practices.

No wonder Republicans complain about having seen this movie.

Bill Whalen, a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, was chief speechwriter for former California Gov. Pete Wilson.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™




We like what we read...

A little slow on the uptake but at least the battle lines are getting drawn. The danger to our society was/is not Al Qaeda all along. Its public employee unions. (and of course the politicians who feel the must pander to them over the small but more numerous voices of taxpayers) Hmmm who would have thought....

http://www.ocregister.com/column/cops-board-believe-1793174-deal-percent
Wednesday, August 1, 2007
Cops' pay has been ripe for backlash

FRANK MICKADEIT
Register columnist
fmickadeit@ocregister.com

The Board of Supervisors says its decision yesterday to begin considering whether to roll back some sheriff's deputies' and D.A. investigators' retirement benefits is necessary because the supervisors must uphold the state Constitution.

And, yes, if the benefits are ultimately cut, it will be because a court rules the 2001 benefits deal violates the Constitution.

But don't make the mistake of believing that at its core this is about fealty to the Constitution. That's a means to an end. That end? Well, the noblest would be fiscal responsibility – not driving the county deeper into unfunded liability. That's undoubtedly amotive, and Supervisor John Moorlach says it is his.

But what I believe this really is about in the global sense – the reason there's support for this beyond one number-crunching supervisor – is because of growing backlash against what are perceived as overly generous contracts for law enforcement. And against police unions' ability to extract those contracts from politicians.

Three- or four-day work weeks. Liberal overtime and vacation policies. Retirement after 25 years at age 50 at 75 percent of their highest salary. (The so-called "3-percent-at-50" that is the subject of this debate.) Stress-related retirements that allow cops to retire with 100 percent of their salary at almost any age.

I'm not just talking about O.C. cops. I'm talking about cops statewide, perhaps best exemplified by a prison-guard union so powerful we're about to be put under total federal control. Politicians who try to rein in compensation find themselves facing election opponents funded by police unions.

The citizenry gives cops tremendous police powers to begin with. When it comes to believe cops are also so powerful they can write their own tickets financially? That breeds a sense the checks and balances are out of whack.

This perception – true or not – has been building now, for at least two decades, with a significant break after 9/11, when we realized just how much these brave men and women mean to us. It's no coincidence that the 3-at-50 deal was cut in December 2001. I'm not here to argue for either side; I'm just analyzing what I believe to be the real driving force, where the overall political will to do this comes from. Grocery clerks' bennies cut. Other hourly jobs go overseas. Cops get fat increases? Backlash city.

See, this has huge statewide implications. Other cities and counties are watching. They were just waiting for someone like Moorlach to come along and make the first move. Moorlach's chief of staff, Mario Mainero, estimates public agencies statewide have $13 billion in unfunded liability because of retroactive pensions.

Here's a very telling indication of how big a deal this is: Mike Capaldi, Dale Dykema, Buck Johns, Tracy Price, Rich Wagner. You know who these guys are? They are leaders in the Lincoln Club, the high-rolling conservative

Republican group founded here in 1962. Some are also members of the even more high-falutin' New Majority.

These guys don't play politics at this level. They're kingmakers. They sit back, give audiences to would-be politicians and write checks. They help put supervisors in office; they don't deign to attend their meetings, for God's sake. But there they were yesterday, sitting in a pack in the Board Chambers. I asked each when he last attended a Board meeting. This is, after all, the most powerful elected local body in Orange County. Capaldi: Can't remember the last time. Dykema: Never. Johns: 15 years ago. Price: Never. Wagner: Years ago.

Wagner, the president, got up and told the Board that hisboard had already voted on whether the county should challenge the 3-at-50. The vote: Yes, 24: No, 0.

It was interesting to see the two men the Lincoln Club helped breathe life into at their political infancies – Mike Carona and Tony Rackauckas– get up yesterday and more or less side with their employees. Both men were somewhat cautious – although Carona called cutting 3-at-50 now "go(ing) to guns" – and urged the supes to take time to study the matter.

T-Rack came off as about the most even-keeled speaker of the day, drawing on his staff lawyers' analysis (do I sense the hand of B. Gurwitz?) and his own experience as a judge to caution the five-member non-lawyer Board that if they go to court, it won't be the slam-dunk victory they might have been led to believe. Can't wait.

Contact the writer: Mickadeit writes Mon.-Fri. Contact him at 714-796-4994 or fmickadeit@ocregister.com.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™




August 4, 2007

The Emperor's new clothes (paycheck)

This is a joke. $250,000 a year for a city manager? In Indio? I dont think so. I say let these geniuses go work in the public sector. You know I dont mind when the private sector guys get sweet deals (not incentive based) as I dont need to pay for the boards overpaying a CEO by simply not buying their products or services. Government is different. I have to pay my taxes (and these fat cats; can you imagine the cost of this dudes pension?). So are these city managers smarter (and therefore better paid) than US Senators? No its just a bidding war with my tax dollars. Just say no. Do we really think that cities could not find "qualified" candidates for 100,000 a year? I know lets make it incentive based. Bring in new tax revenue and well give you 25% of what you catch.

I love this exchange from the article:

"I haven't cost the city of Indio anything, really. I've brought money in they didn't have," Southard said. Asked what major projects he had completed since coming to Indio, Southard didn't provide specifics. He said he had paved a significant amount of roads, helped the city become more financially stable, expanded the parks system and sought retail development.

So let me get this straight...no specifics on new revenue...just that he spent more tax dollars on paving roads and parks. I guess this guy is pretty smart to pass of that BS accounting and get the city council to but it. Like I said. Bring in real "new" tax revenue and get a bonus. None and you get no bonus. What's good for the private sector (big fat sallaries) is good for the public sector (incentive based pay)

By NAOMI KRESGE
The Press-Enterprise

Indio shocked cities throughout Inland Southern California two years ago when it raised the standard for city-manager pay by hiring Glenn Southard at $240,000 a year plus benefits.

Other cities quickly followed, and a salary of more than $200,000 a year is now common for Inland city managers.

In July, Southard broke another Inland pay ceiling when Indio's City Council agreed to pay him $300,000 a year, plus an immediate $30,000 bonus.

"Two years ago that would have been unheard of," said Bill Garrett, executive director for the California City Management Foundation, a professional association where Southard is a trustee. "The numbers are just going nuts."

A Press-Enterprise survey of 32 cities in Riverside and San Bernardino counties showed average pay has doubled in the past decade for city managers, far outpacing the raises given to other city employees. City managers are the behind-the-scenes leaders who supervise day-to-day city business and take orders from elected city councils.

Fifteen surveyed cities paid their managers more than $200,000 last year. Five years ago, none of them paid as much.

The average full-time Inland city manager made about $195,000 in 2006, federal W-2 forms show. The tax records included not just base salary but also end-of-year sick and executive leave and vacation payouts that could add tens of thousands of dollars to salaries.

Rapidly rising pay is tied to an expectation that city managers will bring in new development and revenue to offset their salaries, city officials said.

"I haven't cost the city of Indio anything, really. I've brought money in they didn't have," Southard said.

Asked what major projects he had completed since coming to Indio, Southard didn't provide specifics. He said he had paved a significant amount of roads, helped the city become more financially stable, expanded the parks system and sought retail development.

Union leaders say city workers know and care how much their city managers are paid, and it's difficult for employees to understand why they are asked to accept a 3 percent cost-of-living increase -- or no raise at all -- from a city manager who just got a double-digit raise, said Tom Ramsey, a supervising labor-relations representative with the San Bernardino Public Employees Association. The union represents more than 15,000 people throughout San Bernardino County.

"I don't want to diminish the responsibility and authority of city managers, but I represent the people who have to get out and work in 116-degree temperatures pouring blacktop," he said.

Unlike compensation for the civil servants they supervise, city managers' pay isn't negotiated by unions or set according to the cost of living. Instead, it's driven by market forces -- and the willingness of city councils to pay more is driving it up, said Steven Frates, a senior fellow at the Rose Institute of State and Local Government at Claremont McKenna College.

"The city-management business is pretty much straight-up supply and demand," Frates said.

Councils put a high premium on city managers who have proven they can attract the development dollars cities want, Frates said.

One of the longest-serving city managers in the area, former Highland manager Sam Racadio, said salaries have risen so dramatically because some city councils have been willing to get into bidding wars. Racadio was the third highest-paid manager in The Press-Enterprise survey, with $250,533 in pay, including the value of his car allowance, deferred compensation and leave payouts from his June 2006 retirement.

"Once one or two get a salary increase, that raises the bar for others, and the salaries begin to rise as city councils compare their managers with others in the area," Racadio wrote in an e-mail last week.

Survey Results

California city-manager salaries are the highest in the West, according to a survey conducted last year by the International City/County Management Association. The association's survey found their counterparts in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington made an average of $128,883.

The association survey relies on cities to report how much they are paying, said Evelina Moulder, the director of survey research. Only 12 California cities reported paying their city managers more than $200,000 in the national survey.

The Press-Enterprise survey showed the actual pay of city managers was higher than the national survey reflected.

In addition to total pay for managers, the newspaper reviewed city managers' contracts, employee salary schedules, population data and budget summaries for the budget year that ended June 30. The results were compared with data from five and 10 years ago. The survey did not include deferred compensation, which could add additional tens of thousands of dollars in pay available upon retirement.

Desert Hot Springs did not provide survey data despite repeated requests for public records. The city's former city manager, Jerry Hanson, left his job in 2005 amid community anger that he had been paid almost $323,000 the previous year when the city gave him an advance on a promised severance payment.

The survey showed Indio's Southard was the top-paid city manager last year among surveyed cities, earning $298,949. City managers from Indian Wells, Highland, Riverside and Fontana rounded out the top five.

Riverside's manager, Brad Hudson, was hired at a base salary of $225,000 at about the same time as Southard. Hudson did not return three calls for comment.

City-manager pay has increased about 53 percent, on average, in the past five years, and has doubled on average in the past decade. By comparison, city maintenance workers saw their pay increase about 32 percent, on average, in the past five years while senior planners saw their pay increase about 26 percent in the same time period.

Small cities appeared just as likely as their larger neighbors to have dramatically increased their executives' pay.

Six of the 10 cities that paid their managers the most have fewer than 100,000 residents. Number two on the list, the wealthy golf-course community of Indian Wells -- where the average family makes more than $119,000 a year and is likely to live behind gates -- has only about 5,000 residents.

A Changing Job?

Some experts and top-paid city managers contend the dramatic increase in salaries is the product of a gradual change in a city manager's job responsibilities. City managers in the past spent their time planning for new roads or reviewing financial documents, they said, while today they've added other duties: negotiating with developers or bringing new-car dealerships or hotels to town. They aim to attract business, and with it, more revenue.

The shift began after Prop. 13 in 1978 limited how much municipalities could increase property taxes, Garrett said. Where city managers in the 1950s and 1960s were often engineers, almost every manager today comes from a social science background and has a master's degree in public or business administration, he said.

"I think they're all underpaid," said Fontana City Manager Ken Hunt, who made the fourth-largest salary last year with $246,390.

Hunt's Fontana City Council raised his base pay on June 20 to $240,000. But Hunt said that's a fraction of the money flowing to the brokers, bond underwriters and other consultants who work on the public-private partnership deals he helps oversee.

"As a CEO, you're the one truly responsible for making all of that stuff happen. There's a lot of people making a lot of money on the work you're doing," Hunt said.

Southard and Bernheimer made a similar argument, saying chief executives at a similar-size business would make more than city managers.

A Forbes Magazine national survey released in June found that chief executives -- of companies as well as in the public and private sector -- made an average wage of $144,600 last year.

Frates, the Rose Institute fellow, said how much a private-sector executive could make is irrelevant. Private-sector pay is based in a different market, with different skills and goals, he said, and many city managers wouldn't be good private-sector managers.

"It's a different art form. In a private sector, everybody agrees what the barometer for success is: it's the bottom line," Frates said.

Conversely, he said, many private-sector executives don't have the skills city managers need -- like an ability to reassure residents or to take the blame when city councils don't fulfill a promise.

Domino Effect

Every time a council reviews a city manager's salary, they look at what's competitive in the marketplace now, said Indian Wells Mayor Rob Bernheimer, whose city manager made $269,990 last year, the second-highest pay in the survey.

These days, Bernheimer said, it seems the norm is more than $200,000.

Murrieta expects to pay that much for its new leader, Mayor Doug McAllister said. In the midst of its second city-manager search in the past five years, the city is paying former Temecula city manager Ron Bradley $25,000 a month -- which would total $300,000 a year -- as an interim until a new full-time manager can be found.

"We are willing to pay what we need to get the right person," McAllister said.

Nowhere in recent years has the domino effect of rising city-manager pay been more clear than in the Coachella Valley, where salaries quickly rose after Indio hired Southard in 2005. Council members and observers said other cities felt they needed to keep up.

Southard was the first in the Coachella Valley to make more than $200,000 a year in base pay. Last year, six of seven cities surveyed in the valley - not including Desert Hot Springs, which didn't respond - paid their managers more than $200,000.

"Most of those managers that got raises thanked me," Southard said.

Bernheimer, the Indian Wells mayor, admitted that Southard's salary has had an effect. But he said Indian Wells also wanted to reward City Manager Greg Johnson for keeping the city financially healthy and for running the city like a business.

"At all levels of city compensation, we've gotten rid of the step system for pay and moved to a system based completely on performance, with incentives, reviews, compensation based on performance," Bernheimer said.

Bernheimer said pay wouldn't necessarily continue to rise with Southard's latest raise.

Indio Councilman Mike Wilson, who has clashed with Southard and voted against the raise on July 3, predicted the opposite.

"Quite frankly, our colleagues in other cities aren't happy because they know they'll have to pay more out because Indio has done what it's done again," Wilson said.

Staff writer Rocky Salmon contributed to this report.

Reach Naomi Kresge at 909-806-3060 or nkresge@PE.com

What's a city manager?

Who: The top executive of a city, responsible for overseeing budgets, negotiating with unions and pursuing development deals. Reports to the City Council.

Education: Usually a master's degree in public administration or business administration.

Benefits: A company car, executive leave, vacation and sick time, plus severance deals increasingly worth 12 months of pay and benefits.

Risks: Likely to be fired if things go wrong. Average city manager tenure nationwide is seven years, and California city managers reported an average term of 3½ years in a 2003 survey by the California City Management Foundation.

Source: California City Management Foundation, International City/County Management Association


Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™
>



Costa Mesa CA now in the sights of the fire and smoke peddlers?

I suspect once the firework companies set their sights on Costa Mesa, this ballot measure would go down in flames. Way too much money involved with the smoke and fire peddlers to let another city fall by the wayside. Plus pyromaniacs are big supporters. The fireworks companies like attacking this city by city as they can out spend everyone as their profit margin is incredible for selling a product once a year.

http://www.dailypilot.com/articles/2007/08/03/politics/dpt-ballot03.prt
Published Thursday, August 2, 2007 10:06 PM PDT
Politics
Two measures requested for ballot
Costa Mesa Councilwoman Linda Dixon proposes having voters decide on fireworks, hotel bed tax issues in February.

By Alicia Robinson

After several election cycles without a local measure on the ballot, Costa Mesa council members next week will consider two requests — the second and third in the last month, after a proposal to ask voters if they want to directly elect their mayor failed to make the ballot on a split City Council vote in July.

Both of the upcoming proposals came from Councilwoman Linda Dixon, and one touches on a long-contentious issue in the city: fireworks.

Dixon asked the council to let city voters decide, possibly in February, whether to ban the "safe and sane" fireworks that are now allowed in Costa Mesa, as well as four other cities in Orange County. She also suggested boosting the hotel bed tax in Costa Mesa by 2%, which is now the lowest in Orange County. Voter approval is required to raise the hotel tax.

On the fireworks issue, Dixon said, "I'm neither for nor against it. I just feel that this is something that people need to voice their opinion on."

The bed tax hike is "not a tax that is placed on residents in Costa Mesa; it's a tax that's placed on visitors in our hotels," she said. The money would go into the city's general fund, but it could be used to put on a fireworks show for the city or to set up a grant program for sports groups that now raise money through fireworks sales, Dixon said.

Costa Mesa isn't alone in eyeing the February ballot. Around Orange County, a total of four jurisdictions — one is Newport Beach — are considering ballot issues for February, and two statewide issues already have qualified.

So why the fuss about February? For one thing, it's the first time the state has had a presidential primary that might have a real impact on whittling the field of Democratic and Republican nominees, UC Irvine political science professor Mark Petracca said.

"California's in play on both sides," he said. "I think that's going to bring people to the polls."

That's one reason why former Costa Mesa Mayor Gary Monahan pushed to get the elected mayor issue on the February ballot, he said. "I think February's going to be an incredible turnout, and the people that turn out are going to be pretty well-informed because they're turning out for a reason — to vote in the presidential primary."

Cost is another factor. It may cost a city roughly $100,000 to get an issue on the February ballot, while it's significantly more to have a separate special election and cheaper to get on the general election ballot in November.

The ballot issue in Newport Beach covers where to build city hall, so "it's good to get the issue settled sooner rather than later, but at the same time you balance it out against the costs of a stand-alone election," said Matt Cunningham, a consultant working on the Newport measure.

Dixon said she'd like to see her issues on the February ballot if they won't cost too much. Monahan said while council members are at it, they might as well throw the mayor issue on the ballot too. He doesn't plan to raise the issue again himself, but he'd like to see someone else bring it back. When Dixon's ballot proposals come up for discussion next week, "A politician that is interested in getting the [elected] mayor on [the ballot] could use that as a bargaining chip," he said.

# ALICIA ROBINSON may be reached at (714) 966-4626 or at alicia.robinson@latimes.com.


Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™




August 3, 2007

Lakewood CA and Bellflower CA FIOS '08 build out

click here to read the forum posts on FIOS in Lakewood CA

I just spoke to the Verizon person in charge of all the FIOS build outs in this area. Still no word on the Bellflower CA Central Office build schedule for 2008. Soon. But she did say that all the people that have contacted me from Bellflower and North Lakewood CA (north of Del Amo) that want FiOS are helping Bellflower's ranking to get on the list and built out earlier.

So keep those emails coming Lakewood CA and Bellflower CA FIOSless people! Updates@laag.us

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™

click here to receive LAAG posts by email

Do we have your attention yet?

LAAG has been beating the pension drum for a while. Now that it has hit Long Beach and Orange County up along side their proverbial heads perhaps now things will start to change. You cant expect to fix crumbling bridges AND have "public safety" people retiring at 50 (for another 40 years) at $150,000 a year plus cost of living and the most generous medical on the planet. You cant give away social programs to everyone. Something has to go. Also people want more police but at what cost. No one looks at the "real" efficiency or effectiveness of police and fire employees due to public unions scuttling that examination. They consider themselves above cost cutting as they are "heroes". Is crime not down? How will 100 police stop a gang murder? Had a fire on your block lately? Local governments mission is to provide infrastructure, and yes "public safety" but not at a cost 3x what private sector employees cost. This reminds me once again of the French Revolution. Remember that? Or even the American Revolution (you know all that silly stuff you learned in high school). Party's over folks. Wake up, its time to pay up. Who wins? Government fat cats, slothful government employees, public unions and their lobbyists and politicians (the last 30 years worth) who got us into this or the taxpayers?


Budget reaches `tipping point'
Mayor says city's struggling despite growing revenue, cutbacks.
By Kristopher Hanson, Staff writer
Article Launched: 08/02/2007 10:43:05 PM PDT

LONG BEACH - Three years into an effort to balance the city's budget, Long Beach continues to struggle financially despite growing revenue streams, a new tax on oil production and cutbacks in most public departments, officials said Thursday.

The city's financial situation was outlined in the proposed Fiscal Year 2008 budget unveiled Thursday by Mayor Bob Foster and several department heads.

"This city now lives paycheck-to-paycheck," Foster said in a briefing at City Hall. "That's the situation we find ourselves in today, and frankly, we're at a tipping point."

Although city government is now forecast to end the next fiscal year with a slim surplus, deferred infrastructure projects, growing police and fire costs and other expenses could have Long Beach facing deficits again in the near future, Foster warned.

The city's fiscal year begins Oct. 1. The proposed budget, which is now available to the public for review and possible revisions, requires approval by the City Council.

Since fiscal year 2004, the city has erased a $60 million structural deficit by freezing vacant positions, consolidating work, increasing user fees and putting off capital improvement projects.

But deferred maintenance has left city streets and public facilities - including fire stations - in disrepair, and the city now estimates it will need $90 million to fix crumbling roadways and $585 million for building repairs and replacement within the next 10 to 20 years.

"We can't continue hobbling along for another decade," Foster said. "We have to change the way we look at things, and that goes for the mayor, the City Council and city staff."

Foster said no specific citywide bond measures or tax increases were being considered at this point, and instead urged more "public-private" partnerships and developments to help offset costs to the city.

Assistant City Manager Christine Shippey, who oversaw the budget's development, indicated the city is also willing to outsource services and sell unspecified assets to raise money.

"We have to consider everything," Shippey said.

The proposed $2.3 billion total budget for 2008 includes $1.94 billion in funds legally restricted for certain purposes, including beach maintenance and harbor development, with $392 million for the General Fund.

The General Fund pays for local government staples like police and fire service, libraries, street repairs and youth programs.

Of that $392 million, police and fire services will eat up 66 percent, with the rest split between community services, public works and general government costs.

The city's 5,853 employees, who include police officers and firefighters, are budgeted to collect nearly $770 million in the coming year in wages and benefits - a roughly 4 percent increase from the current fiscal year.

The proposed budget includes money for 14 additional police officers and 12 firefighters funded through fees collected by Proposition H, which voters approved in May.

The measure increased taxes on the nearly 40,000 barrels of oil pumped in the city daily and is expected to raise $3.6 million to $4 million annually.

Prop H money will also be used to buy a new fire ladder truck for Station 4 or Station 14.

While no dramatic cuts have been structured into the FY 2008 budget, the city will stop an extended day care program and continue not filling vacant positions.

In addition, authorities plan to lobby for more grants and revenues from county, state and federal governments for street work and infrastructure.

Long Beach Financial Director Mike Killebrew said the city is also studying financial practices in each department to determine where money can be saved.

Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske said that while the budget reflects the city's progress through tough financial times, it fails to address how Long Beach will put more cops on the street - a stated goal of the council.

"I am concerned ... by the lack of any reference in this budget as to how and when this city will add an additional 100 police officers on our streets - a goal many of us were committed to during our recent campaigns," Schipske said in a statement.

Schipske also urged city staff to eliminate duplicative functions at City Hall and increase the use of volunteers as ways to keep costs down.

The councilwoman is hosting a budget workshop for 5th District residents at 6 p.m. Aug. 13 in the El Dorado Park Senior Center, 2800 Studebaker Road.

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™




August 2, 2007

Background on Tesco moving in to South and Woodruff location

From what we read below we are not too keen on Tesco's record outside of CA. However with grocery strikes constantly on the horizon it will be nice to see an alternative to Pavillions at South St. and Woodruff. We'll see how much of a good neighbor Tesco is based upon what they do to bring that old Petco store up to snuff with all the other stores at South and Woodruff that have updated/upgraded their facades. All with the exception of cheapskate Rite-Aid of course.

See the update on this story here as Rite Aid and Tesco Fresh and Easy upgrade their looks like the rest of the tenants.

As for the owner of Fresh & Easy (Tesco Plc, a UK based company) it looks like they are fighting a hard battle in the UK over animal rights issues. Read more here. It looks like they are trying to be socially and environmentally responsible in California (Read more here) and the US but China is another story. A number of companies struggle with the issue of socially unacceptable practices in one country that are acceptable in another. It will be interesting to to see who wins this battle; the PETA type folks or the global warming folks.


From the Los Angeles Times
Local and global reputation of British grocer Tesco at odds
It has created a socially responsible image in California, its newest market. But abroad, it is likened to Wal-Mart.

By Jerry Hirsch
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

August 2, 2007

In California, giant British retailer Tesco is carefully cultivating an image as a socially responsible grocer with good-paying jobs, fresh organic foods and the latest in environmentally friendly technology.

But the firm's new Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market chain, due to open here this fall, is a far cry from the Tesco flagship stores in Britain, where the vast supermarkets are more like Wal-Mart in size, selection and controversy.

To prove its green credentials, Fresh & Easy adopted a baby elephant in Kenya, it roofed its Disneyland-sized distribution center in Riverside with solar energy arrays and will use a polar bear as a corporate symbol to remind people of global warming. Workers will start at $10 an hour and get health insurance.

Internationally, however, Tesco has come under fire for the decapitation of live turtles at stores in China, alleged purchases of sweatshop goods from Bangladesh and unfettered expansion in England that is driving small shops out of business.

"Tesco has been especially adept at marketing itself as a socially responsible corporation," said Robert Gottlieb, an Occidental College urban policy professor. "Its track record has significant gaps between what it has promised and how it has achieved its current position as one of the top multinational operations."

Gottlieb's Urban and Environmental Policy Institute plans to issue a report today that will offer communities recommendations on how to deal with Tesco. He warns that the small Fresh & Easy stores are only a beachhead. He said Tesco was seeking to make it U.S. business "as massive" as the company's presence in England.

Tesco rejects the criticism and dismisses any comparison between its efforts in the United States and controversies around the world. It is "unfair to suggest our statements about our planned business in the U.S. are not genuine by picking a handful of isolated issues that have occurred around the world over the past few years," company spokesman Greg Sage said.

With about $80 billion in annual sales, Tesco is the world's third-largest food retailer. It is spending $2 billion to build what will probably be hundreds of small grocery stores in Southern California and the Southwest. The first Fresh & Easy markets will open in November.

Tesco's California marketing strategy is calculated to create a "touchy feely" image that "goes for the heartstrings," said Mohan Sodhi, a management professor at City University in London. In England, Tesco is about low prices, creating the type of negative publicity and images that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. faces in the United States, Sodhi said.

Company spokesman Sage said Tesco had addressed the treatment of turtles. He said the company has "carried out extensive research" over the last year and has changed the way it slaughters live soft-shell turtles. Tesco employees now crush the turtle's head after removal, to end any lingering suffering that might be felt by the animal.

"Finding a balance between the very important issue of animal welfare and the attitudes and traditions of other countries is not always easy, but nonetheless we have made some real improvements," Sage said.

But the turtle issue and other criticisms are likely to follow the company as it opens its Fresh & Easy stores here in Southern California, consumers say.

Arrissia Owen Turner, who was looking forward to shopping in Fresh & Easy stores near her home in Ontario, said how the company treated animals and workers in other nations would influence her shopping habits.

Just because something is acceptable in one culture or tradition doesn't make it right, Owen Turner said. "I don't go to Wal-Mart because it doesn't give a livable wage and good benefits to its employees."

Elsewhere, Tesco faces criticism for the working conditions at some of its suppliers.

ActionAid, a South Africa-based anti-poverty agency, has repeatedly urged Tesco to improve working conditions for South African fruit pickers that supply the retailer.

At the company's annual meeting in June, Gertruida Baartman said there had been little improvement in the working conditions for agricultural workers like herself.

"I am here again because things haven't changed in our lives. Our children still go to bed hungry, and we use pesticides with our bare hands," said Baartman, who earns about 75 cents an hour for the fruit that winds up on Tesco's shelves in Europe.

In response, the company said it planned to expand ethical audits of South African farms.

According to War on Want, another anti-poverty group, workers in Bangladesh are paid about 10 cents an hour to produce clothes for Tesco's British stores. The group said employees at one plant in Dhaka work "up to 20 hours a day in locked premises."

Sage defended the company's record in Bangladesh, saying it had done all it could "to ensure that high standards and good conditions are maintained by the most thorough independent audits carried out anywhere in the world."

Like Wal-Mart, Tesco often is blamed for driving out of business small independent companies in the towns where it sets up shop. It is a concern of residents in the village of Cuffley, north of London, where Tesco Chief Executive Terry Leahy lives.

Grass-roots group Keep Cuffley Rural organized an advisory poll it hoped would persuade planning authorities to block a store opening. Nearly two-thirds of the village's adults voted in the poll, said John Stredwick, chairman of the group, and 83% voted against the development.



"We are happy to drive the three miles to the huge supermarket they already have near here, but when they want to drop into a small village with a plan to wipe out all the local jobs, it is a different story," Stredwick said.

While Cuffley residents are fighting Tesco, residents of the Glassell Park section of Los Angeles are looking forward to the Fresh & Easy market.

Both Albertsons and Ralphs have closed supermarkets in the neighborhood, leaving the community with one independent grocer and a smattering of small convenience stores.

Laura Gutierrez, president of the Glassell Park Improvement Assn., said, "Our community has gone through tremendous changes and needs grocery stores."

jerry.hirsch@latimes.com

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™




July 30, 2007

wildfire costs go wild

This story is a real gem. 47.00 a day for lunch? 400.00 for a sink (excuse me "handwashing station")? I have to agree. You build a home out in the sticks taxpayers should not be bailing you out. Better hope you have good fire insurance. Firefighters I know just refer to "wildfires" as way to pay for their new boat. And of course there is no upside for taxpayers. Fires end up doing what they do while firefighters stand by on triple overtime.


latimes.com
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-zacafire29jul29,1,4309374.story
From the Los Angeles Times
Officials seek to contain wildfire costs
After a sharply critical federal report on efforts to hold down expenses, managers begin to alter long-used strategies and front-line practices.
By Steve Chawkins
Times Staff Writer

July 29, 2007

SANTA YNEZ, CALIF. — For a tense couple of weeks, the 31,000-acre Zaca fire threatened to scorch more than 1,000 square miles of wilderness and reach the outskirts of communities as far-flung as Santa Barbara and Ojai.

Now, the smoke is clearing but the long, dark shadow of the auditor looms over a massive operation that has cost an average of more than $1 million a day for nearly a month.

Eye-popping wildfire expenditures aren't all that unusual — this month's inferno at Lake Tahoe ran up daily bills of $1.8 million — but increasingly they have drawn stern warnings from Congress and repeated promises from fire officials to hold the line on spending.

Such cost consciousness could bring changes welcomed by environmentalists — such as firefighters simply keeping an eye on certain remote wilderness fires rather than stomping them out in what foresters a century ago likened to the moral equivalent of war. As bone-dry California plunges into another severe wildfire season, fire officials say their new frugality could also alter other long-used firefighting strategies and front-line practices.

With the Zaca fire just 51% contained early last week, hundreds of firefighters from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the U.S. Forest Service and other agencies already had been released to go home or battle fires elsewhere. At base camp eight miles from the bucolic Santa Ynez Valley, giant bulldozers were being loaded onto flatbed trucks, one of two mobile showers was hauled away and workers were dismantling a huge tent where managers had been meeting to discuss daily strategy.

The shifts reflected greater attention to the bottom line, officials said.

"In the past, some incident commanders have been overly cautious," keeping manpower and equipment on hand past the time they were really necessary, said Mike Ferris, a U.S. Forest Service spokesman at base camp. "Now, we're challenging that way of thinking."

Whether such measures will satisfy the Forest Service's critics is an open question.

In a scathing report last month, the congressional General Accountability Office contended that the Forest Service and allied agencies "have neither clearly defined their cost-containment goals and objectives nor developed a strategy for achieving them."

The GAO acknowledged some Forest Service attempts to trim costs but said they were inadequate, allowing wildfire expenses to nearly triple in a decade. Forest Service officials, who have heard similar complaints before, said they took the criticism to heart.

"After the billion-and-a-half dollars that we spent last year, we did a lot of soul-searching about things we can do better," said Tom Harbour, the agency's director of fire and aviation management, in a telephone interview from a wildfire in Idaho. One result: Top-level Forest Service management teams are rushed in to eyeball expenses and strategy on fires, such as Zaca, where costs surpass $10 million.

Last year set a wildfire record, with flames blackening more than 13,500 square miles — the equivalent of Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island combined. The Day fire north of Los Angeles swept through more than 250 square miles, at a cost topping $70 million.

Harbour said officials have renewed their vow to let fires in some areas long untouched by flame burn for the well-being of the forest. And he suggested that firefighters would steer clear of heroic measures to save remote, wood-shingled forest hideaways surrounded by cascades of flammable shrubbery.

"We may not even commit firefighters to try to protect a home like that," he said.

The Zaca fire started July 4, when a ranch worker was grinding a length of irrigation pipe and a stray spark ignited some grasses. Firefighters managed to steer the fast-moving blaze away from Los Olivos and other communities but lost a race to keep it out of the chaparral-choked San Rafael Wilderness Area, which is inaccessible to trucks, bulldozers and other heavy equipment.

The only alternative was a costly, full-on attack using air tankers and helicopters, said Ferris of the Forest Service. Fire crews were dropped onto ridges and picked up every two or three days, reducing the cost of shuttling them back to camp each night.

Even so, aircraft rental adds up to real money in no time. Firefighting helicopters go for about $8,000 an hour; and at one time, 14 choppers and six air tankers were active at Zaca. Air attack, in fact, typically accounts for about one-third of all wildfire expenses. But the Forest Service believes it's cheaper to rent than to buy and maintain a year-round fleet, Ferris said.

Other expenses also mount quickly. Even seasonal firefighters — sometimes college students on summer break — can pull down $23 an hour including overtime. Full-time professionals — about 50 Santa Barbara County firefighters were at Zaca — make their regular pay and, often, overtime.

The agency gives an energy-restoring 6,000 calories a day to hardworking firefighters, so food can cost $47 a day per person. In addition to costly heavy equipment rentals, there are unglamorous necessities — such as an eight-sink hand-washing station that rents for $400 a day, according to the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise, Idaho.

At the Zaca fire, the more than $35 million spent so far could have been a mere down payment if the flames had swept into the adjacent Bob Smith and Matilija wilderness areas. Much of that acreage has not burned in at least 100 years, and officials said fire could have roared through the rough terrain unabated.

"If the weather hadn't cooperated with our firefighting efforts, this could have been much, much worse," said Capt. Eli Iskow, a spokesman for the Santa Barbara County Fire Department. "We were 'what if-ing' this situation to death."

The worst-case scenario was outlined in blue on a huge map at Command Row, the dozen trailers that served as executive suites at Zaca's base camp. It showed the fire spanning about 800,000 acres — a vast swath that would have threatened the fringes of coastal Santa Barbara and inland Ojai. To prepare, firefighters carved nearly 200 miles of containment lines, some as far as 15 miles from the flames.

The aggressive — if costly — air campaign paid off, Ferris said: "It was a question of pay now — or pay a lot more later."

Critics such as Tim Ingalsbee, a former seasonal firefighter who now teaches fire courses at the University of Oregon, cast a skeptical eye on wildfire costs.

"About 45% of the Forest Service's budget is related to fire, and that's a big source of the problem," said Ingalsbee, founder of Firefighters United for Safety, Ethics and Ecology. "The agency sees its money train hitched to fire."

He said costs could be slashed with greater attention to contracts, which can be bloated, and a greater willingness to use prescribed burns — fires set to thin the fuel supply in overgrown wilderness areas.

Prescribed burns hadn't been set in the wilderness areas singed by the Zaca fire, said John Bridgwater, Ojai District Ranger in the Los Padres National Forest. Managers calculated that thinning areas closer to ever-encroaching subdivisions made more fiscal sense, he said.

But some environmentalists say that, in general, the agency's approach seems to be changing — prompted at least in part by criticism of runaway costs.

"More than ever, the leadership is encouraging people on the ground to look at each fire as an individual event, as opposed to something that has to be extinguished as soon as possible," said Jaelith Hall-Rivera, a Washington-based wildfire policy analyst for the Wilderness Society. "Certainly they can be moving faster, but it's not something you can fix overnight."

Lakewood Accountability Action Group™ LAAG | www.LAAG.us | Lakewood, CA
A California Non Profit Association | Demanding action and accountability from local government™