November 9, 2006

The Fireworks Money Won

Imagine that! I want to thank everyone who helped out on the Yes on Measure D effort. Again it was grass roots and had no where near the money the fireworks company dumped into this. There were 19,707 total Measure D votes cast out of 41,000 registered voters. That is a 48% turnout which is quite good. In fact more people voted on the fireworks measure when compared to the other two parking measures. Yes on D also did not do that bad when compared to the loosing side on the parking measures. If you look at the $40,000 spent by the fireworks companies that is about $3.35 per yes vote. Not bad when you consider the hundreds of thousands of dollars they will reap in years to come from selling smoke and sparks.

One thing to keep in mind is that if you extrapolate these election figures out to the entire population of Lakewood that is over 32,000 residents that STILL WANT TO BAN ALL FIREWORKS. That is a large number of taxpayers.

Which brings me to my next point. Mayor Van Nostran (30 years on the council) said on the Lakewood webpage "And there will be no return to the situation in past years, when fireworks turned too many neighborhoods into virtual battlegrounds. The city council will deploy – and expand as necessary – a vigorous Sheriff-led public safety presence in the weeks before July 4, 2007."

Of course that same vigorous sheriff enforcement is what led to the Dunrobin Miller Explosion in the first place! Also missing from the Mayor's statement is just what will be cut from the city budget every year from now on to hire all the additional officers to make sure all the "safe and sane" users have a good time burning up their money while at the same time chasing the illegal users. We all know from the last 10 years before July 2006 how successful that campaign has been!

LAAG will continue to monitor the situation as it develops. And there are still many other issues in the city that need "action" and "accountability".

The parking issues appear to be on the right track for now but surely the ball will get dropped in the enforcement and in the details of the implementation. We also still have on property parking to deal with in a city chocked full of eyesores.


As of Date: 11/08/2006 Time: 04:01 Votes Percent

LAKEWOOD MEASURE

D - PROHIBITION OF FIREWORKS - YES 7,659 38.86
(MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST) - NO 12,049 61.14

F - PROHIBIT TRAILR ST PRKING - YES 13,798 70.80
(MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST) - NO 5,692 29.20

C - PROHIBIT RV STREET PRKING - YES 13,128 67.56
(MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST) - NO 6,304 32.44

TOTAL PRECINCTS 57 PRECINCTS REPORTING 57 100.00
REGISTRATION 41,000

November 6, 2006

Litigation filed against American Promotional Events, Inc (TNT fireworks in CA)

Below is a list of all civil cases filed by and against American Promotional Events, (APE) Inc. in all federal courts in the USA. APE does business in CA under the name "TNT Fireworks". It does not include state court suits or claims not yet in litigation. There may also be personal injury cases against APE in these cases below. Of particular interest are the cases by the city of Rialto and City of Colton (in bold type below). In those cases APE is being accused by the cities of contaminating the groundwater with the chemical Perchlorate, which is used in fireworks. From an 11/2/06 story in the San Bernardino County Sun, it was reported that "Perchlorate has spread from properties in north Rialto, contaminating wells in both cities. The cost of cleaning up the entire Rialto-Colton basin is expected to run into the hundreds of millions of dollars." The Colton case was dismissed due to a federal procedural issue and may be re-filed in state court. The Rialto case will move forward in Federal Court.

Vote YES on Measure D


Civil Name Search Results
22 Total Party matches for selection AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS for ALL COURTS
Search done Fri Nov 3 13:04:27 2006

Name Court Case No. Filed NOS Closed
1 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC alndce 3:2003cv00032 01/07/2003 190 02/23/2004
American Promotional v. Eckerd Corporation

2 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC scdce 2:1999cv00171 01/20/1999 360 04/14/2000
Lennen, et al v. Dillard Department

3 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC wawdce 2:1995cv00743 05/15/1995 840 04/15/1996
Pyrodyne American, et al v. Western Fireworks

4 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC wawdce 2:1995cv00743 05/15/1995 840 04/15/1996
Pyrodyne American, et al v. Western Fireworks

5 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC alndce 3:2000cv03515 12/06/2000 442 12/11/2001
Pritchard v. American Promotional

6 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC-WEST cacdce 5:2004cv00079 01/21/2004 893
City of Rialto v. United States Department of Defense

7 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC-WEST cacdce 2:2005cv01479 02/28/2005 890
Colton City of v. American Promotional Events Inc-West

8 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC-WEST cacdce 2:2005cv01479 02/28/2005 890
Colton City of v. American Promotional Events Inc-West

9 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS OF ALABAMA INC wawdce 3:1999cv05338 06/25/1999 840 07/02/1999 American Promotional v. Thunder Fireworks, et al

10 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS OF ALABAMA INC. ohndce 4:1999cv00776 04/02/1999 840 05/18/1999 Amer Promo Events AL v. BJ Alan Company Inc.

11 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS OF ALABAMA INC. ohndce 4:1999cv02371 10/04/1999 840 03/02/2000 B. J. Alan Company v. Amer Promo Events AL

12 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS OF ALABAMA, INC. ksdce 2:1999cv02235 06/01/1999 840 06/24/1999 American Promotional v. Jakes Fireworks Inc

13 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC tnedce 3:1997cv00709 09/22/1997 442 12/30/1997
Green v. American Promotional, et al

14 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC tnedce 3:1997cv00710 09/22/1997 442 12/30/1997
Rogers v. American Promotional, et al

15 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC ctdce 3:2001cv01168 06/22/2001 440 07/06/2001
American Promotional v. Spada, et al

16 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC. nddce 4:2006cv00014 03/14/2006 840
American Promotional Events, Inc. v. Gaudreau et al
17 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC. hidce 1:2002cv00018 01/09/2002 840 01/08/2003
American Promotional v. Asia Pacific Trading, et al

18 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC. ncmdce 2:1995cv00535 07/21/1995 840 12/20/1996
AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL v. VICTORY FIREWORKS, et al

19 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC. miwdce 1:2001cv00817 12/17/2001 840 12/02/2002
American Promotional Events, Inc. v. M.T. Sales, Inc. et al

20 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC. laedce 2:1998cv01367 05/06/1998 365 07/14/1998
Malone v. Amer Promotional, et al

21 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC. - EAST insdce 1:2003cv00117 01/27/2003 840 03/25/2004 CELEBRATION FIREWORKS II, INC. v. AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC. - EAST et al

22 AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, TEXAS, L.P. txwdce 7:2006cv00082 06/26/2006 440 08/18/2006 Texas Pyrotechnic Association v. Alamo Fireworks Incorporated

VOTE YES on Measure D